2000
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ribosome Traffic in E. coli and Regulation of Gene Expression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some unicellular organisms, highly expressed genes have a strong selective preference for the codons complementary to the most abundant tRNA species, whereas lower expressed genes display more uniform codon usage patterns largely compatible with the mutational bias in the absence of translational selection [10,46]. In mammals and birds, the diverse patterns of codon usage may arise from compositional constraints of the genomes [47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some unicellular organisms, highly expressed genes have a strong selective preference for the codons complementary to the most abundant tRNA species, whereas lower expressed genes display more uniform codon usage patterns largely compatible with the mutational bias in the absence of translational selection [10,46]. In mammals and birds, the diverse patterns of codon usage may arise from compositional constraints of the genomes [47][48][49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the synonymous codon usage are not used equally both within and between genomes [1][2][3]. While several factors such as mutational bias [4][5][6], translational selection [7][8][9][10], secondary structure of proteins [11][12][13], replicational and transcriptional selection [14,15], and environmental factors [16,17] have been reported to influence the codon usage in various organisms. In contrast, amino acid usage has been demonstrated to be influenced by factors such as hydrophobicity, aromaticity, cysteine residue (Cys) content, and mean molecular weight [16,18], growth temperature, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, translation selection in nature and compositional constraints are thought to be the two major factors accounting for variation of codon usage pattern among genomes in various organisms (Karlin and Mrázek 1996;Lesnik et al 2000;). Comparison with pattern of synonymous codon usage in different mammals, compositional constraints of the genomes play a weak role in some unicellular organisms (such as Escherichia coli & Sacchromyces cerevisiae) and high expression genes have a obvious selective discrepancy for codon usage with a high concentration of the particular acceptor tRNA molecular, in contrast, low expressed genes show a obviously similar codon usage pattern (Gouy and Gautier 1982;Grantham et al 1981;Ghosh et al 2000;Lesnik et al 2000;Majumdar et al 1999;Ohno et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In E. coli and yeast, synonymous codon usage patterns are related to the abundance of isoaccepting tRNAs [7,56] , where highly expressed genes have a strong selective preference for the codons complementary to the most abundant tRNA species, whereas lowly expressed genes display more uniform codon usage patterns largely compatible with the mutational bias in the absence of translational selection [57,58] . In mammals and birds, the diverse patterns of codon usage may arise from the compositional constraints of the genomes [19,59,60] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%