Ribosomal DNA systematics ofCeratobasidiumandThanatephoruswithRhizoctoniaanamorphs

Gonzalez, Dolorez; Carling, D. E.; Kuninaga, Shiro; Vilgalys, Rytas; Cubeta, Marc A.

doi:10.1080/00275514.2001.12063247

Cited by 76 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This result agrees with that of Gonzalez et al (2001), who reported the phylogenetic relationships of Ceratobasidium and Thanatephorus with Rhizoctonia anamorph using ribosomal RNA systematics. Toda et al (1999) reported that isolates of AG-Q, a causal agent of bermudagrass disease, can anastomose with isolates of AG-D and should be identified as the AG-D group.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 95%

Analysis of whole cellular fatty acids and anastomosis relationships of binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. associated with Ceratobasidium cornigerum

Matsumoto

2005

Mycoscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 95%

Analysis of whole cellular fatty acids and anastomosis relationships of binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. associated with Ceratobasidium cornigerum

Matsumoto

2005

Mycoscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Combined analyses of the phylogenetic relationships of BNR (Ceratobasidium) and MNR (Thanatephorus) by cladistic analyses of ITS and 28S rDNA sequences revealed a total of 31 genetically distinct groups (21 MNR and 10 BNR groups), which corresponded well with previously recognized AGs and subgroups (Gonzalez et al 2001). The phylogenetic analysis further suggested that certain AGs are not monophyletic and that there is a greater taxonomic support for AG subgroups than for AGs.…”

Section: Rdna Sequence Analysismentioning

confidence: 69%

“…isolates have been reported (Liu and Sinclair 1992;Kasimadri et al 2002;Kuninaga et al 1997;Salazar et al 2000a;Gonzalez et al 2001;Carling et al 2002;Toda et al 2004). Applications of rDNA-ITS sequence analysis are expected to greatly advance our knowledge regarding Rhizoctonia spp.…”

Section: Detailed Classification Of Mnr Isolates To Ags and Subgroupsmentioning

confidence: 81%

“…Attempts to designate an order of numbers to clusters of several AGs along the tree (Gonzalez et al 2001(Gonzalez et al , 2002 are therefore inconsistent and may be misleading. Moreover, choosing one of the best MP trees might be less reliable then using a consensus tree combining all the best MP trees resulted in the analysis.…”

Section: Detailed Classification Of Mnr Isolates To Ags and Subgroupsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…In several publications, rDNA-ITS sequences of only one isolate per AG were used for cluster analysis (Gonzalez et al 2001(Gonzalez et al , 2002Salazar et al 2000). When the sequence was from an incorrectly designated isolate as discussed by Sharon et al (in preparation), misinterpretation of the results and wrong conclusions were drawn.…”

Section: Detailed Classification Of Mnr Isolates To Ags and Subgroupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The advancing identification and classification of Rhizoctonia spp. using molecular and biotechnological methods compared with the classical anastomosis grouping

et al. 2006

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anamorphic classification of Rhizoctonia spp. has been based on young cell nuclear numbers and hyphal fusion to anastomosis groups (AGs), in addition to the teleomorph classification. The widespread development of molecular biology techniques has added modern tools to support classification of organisms according to their genetics and evolutionary processes. These various methods have also been used in recent years for classification of Rhizoctonia. Data are continuously accumulating in the literature and the sequences in databases, which are readily available for researchers in the network systems. In the present review, attempts were made to describe and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the various methods for the classification of Rhizoctonia spp. Currently, the rDNAinternal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence analysis seems to be the most appropriate method for classification of Rhizoctonia spp. Data of all the appropriate multinucleate Rhizoctonia (MNR) accumulated in GenBank were analyzed together in neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximumparsimony (MP) trees supplemented with percent sequence similarity within and among AGs and subgroups. Generally, the clusters of the isolate sequences were supportive of the AGs and subgroups based on hyphal fusion anastomosis. The review also indicates inaccuracies in designation of sequences of some isolates deposited in GenBank. The review includes detailed analyses of the MNR groups and subgroups, whereas complementary descriptions of the binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR), uninucleate Rhizoctonia (UNR), and comprehensive interrelationships among all the currently available MNR, BNR, and UNR groups and subgroups in GenBank are to be discussed in a subsequent review article.

show abstract

Diseases which Challenge Global Wheat Production—Root, Crown, and Culm Rots

Smiley

Backhouse

Lucas³

et al. 2009

Wheat Science and Trade

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ribosomal DNA systematics ofCeratobasidiumandThanatephoruswithRhizoctoniaanamorphs

Cited by 76 publications

References 37 publications

Analysis of whole cellular fatty acids and anastomosis relationships of binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. associated with Ceratobasidium cornigerum

Analysis of whole cellular fatty acids and anastomosis relationships of binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. associated with Ceratobasidium cornigerum

The advancing identification and classification of Rhizoctonia spp. using molecular and biotechnological methods compared with the classical anastomosis grouping

Diseases which Challenge Global Wheat Production—Root, Crown, and Culm Rots

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About