2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2003.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ribosomal DNA exhibits few alterations in human skin cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings presented here are in agreement with the view that rDNA genes are heterogeneous and dynamic Sylvester 1995, 2001;Kuo et al 1996;Grozdanov et al 2003;Romao-Correa et al 2004). Gonzalez and Sylvester analyzed the type of exchange that occurs in the rDNA region, and they reported the presence of very divergent IGS sequence classes (Gonzalez and Sylvester 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings presented here are in agreement with the view that rDNA genes are heterogeneous and dynamic Sylvester 1995, 2001;Kuo et al 1996;Grozdanov et al 2003;Romao-Correa et al 2004). Gonzalez and Sylvester analyzed the type of exchange that occurs in the rDNA region, and they reported the presence of very divergent IGS sequence classes (Gonzalez and Sylvester 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…4A, arrows). Upon digestion with HindIII, Southern blotting showed the expected band at ∼15 kb (Romao-Correa et al 2004). The bands previously described, ranging from 13.3 to 16.7, are not visible, because they require overexposure of the membrane and a higher separation (Krystal and Arnheim 1978).…”
Section: Southern Blotting Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional studies in mice and rat cell lines report a lack of change in rDNA copy number with age [14][15][16] . In both cancer and aging studies, not all cancers and not all aging tissues or organisms appear to display changes in rDNA copy number 1,4,17,18 . In short, there is no universal agreement on whether rDNA copy number changes with age or cancer.…”
Section: Thousands Of High-quality Sequencing Samples Fail To Show Mementioning
confidence: 99%