2001
DOI: 10.1006/abio.2001.5171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ribosomal 18S RNA Prevails over Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase and β-Actin Genes as Internal Standard for Quantitative Comparison of mRNA Levels in Invasive and Noninvasive Human Melanoma Cell Subpopulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
214
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
10
214
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase is an abundant glycolytic enzyme and therefore an increase in transcription is consistent with a higher demand of cellular energy associated with growth and cell differentiation. Normalisation to GAPDH was already reported as valid (Wall and Edwards 2002), however in most cases this gene proved to be inappropriate as endogenous control in quantification assays (Schmittgen and Zakrajsek 2000;Goidin et al 2001;Kim et al 2003). A maximum variability of GAPDH of 25 fold has been reported (Dheda et al 2004), and according to Bustin (2002) for most experimental conditions the use of GAPDH is inappropriate and should be discontinued.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase is an abundant glycolytic enzyme and therefore an increase in transcription is consistent with a higher demand of cellular energy associated with growth and cell differentiation. Normalisation to GAPDH was already reported as valid (Wall and Edwards 2002), however in most cases this gene proved to be inappropriate as endogenous control in quantification assays (Schmittgen and Zakrajsek 2000;Goidin et al 2001;Kim et al 2003). A maximum variability of GAPDH of 25 fold has been reported (Dheda et al 2004), and according to Bustin (2002) for most experimental conditions the use of GAPDH is inappropriate and should be discontinued.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, 18S ribosomal RNA has been reported as a reliable reference gene for real-time RT-PCR in distinct experimental conditions (Schmittgen and Zakrajsek 2000;Goidin et al 2001;Kim et al 2003). However, according to Solanas et al (2001) there are some concerns regarding the use of rRNA as internal standard due to variations in rRNA expression levels, transcription by different RNA polymerases and possible imbalances in rRNA and mRNA fractions between different samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…"Internal reference" genes are presumed to be essential for cell viability and thus constitutively expressed to maintain cellular function [6], and are widely employed as quantification controls, correlating target gene levels to that of the reference gene [7]. The expression of even the most commonly used internal controls may vary as a result of neoplastic growth, leading to inaccurate quantification [8]. In the present study, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and 18S rRNA, two of the most commonly used internal reference genes, were investigated as controls for qPCR analysis of melanoma tissue, native tissue, cultured melanoma cells, and fibroblasts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several growth dependant signaling pathways have been implicated in regulating rRNA levels [13], such as the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, both of which have been described as crucial for melanoma 14;15]. Thus, as with GAPDH, it is understandable as to why 18S rRNA is not a good choice as a control gene for melanoma and normal tissue types.A previous study found 18S rRNA to be a more reliable standard compared to GAPDH or β-actin in cultured melanoma cells [8]. However, this prior study utilized regular PCR and duplex relative PCR, both of which are based on the visualization and quantification of the PCR products by gel electrophoresis and densiometric analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%