1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00394777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhythms of fragrance emission in flowers

Abstract: A method for the sampling of volatiles emitted by individual flowers is described. Sampling over periods of 3 h allowed the examination of diurnal changes in quantity and quality of fragrance. In the species studied, Odontoglossum constrictum Lindl., Citrus medica L., Hoya carnosa R. Br., and Stephanotis floribunda Brongs., the fragrance was characterized by a few major components accompanied by a larger number of minor components. Flowers of all species produced volatiles in a rhythmical, diurnal fashion. Whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the floral scent evolution must fit into plant life histories in ways that minimize potential metabolic and ecological costs involved in the scent production (e.g., Gershenzon 1994;Raguso 2008;Wright and Schiestl 2009). Therefore, floral scent emission is expected to peak in association with the peak activity periods of their pollinators (Hoballah et al 2005;Matile and Altenburger 1988;Raguso et al 2003). In Lithophragma, which often depend nearly exclusively on the day-flying Greya moths, scent production was markedly higher in the daytime samples than in the nighttime collections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the floral scent evolution must fit into plant life histories in ways that minimize potential metabolic and ecological costs involved in the scent production (e.g., Gershenzon 1994;Raguso 2008;Wright and Schiestl 2009). Therefore, floral scent emission is expected to peak in association with the peak activity periods of their pollinators (Hoballah et al 2005;Matile and Altenburger 1988;Raguso et al 2003). In Lithophragma, which often depend nearly exclusively on the day-flying Greya moths, scent production was markedly higher in the daytime samples than in the nighttime collections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that temporary, but substantial, increases or decreases in emission were missed because of their short duration, but headspace collections made at 6-h intervals also failed to detect such changes, and samples did not vary by more than a factor of 1.5 (data not shown). Daily cycling in emission of linalool and other floral scent components, with a nocturnal peak in intensity coinciding with periods of moth activity, is a feature of many moth-pollinated flowers, such as Cestrum noctumum (Solanaceae) (Overland, 1960;Matile and Altenburger, 1988). However, in other moth-pollinated flowers, such as Nicotiana sylvestris (Solanaceae), rates of linalool emission do not differ appreciably between night and day (Loughrin et al, 1990(Loughrin et al, , 1991.…”
Section: Discussion Temporal Variation In Scent Production By Whole Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many plants emit volatile compounds continuously and at a constant level during flowering, other flowering plants emit scent in a rhythmic manner with a diurnal or nocturnal maximum (Matile and Altenburger, 1988;Loughrin et al, 1990;Nielsen et al, 1995;Helsper et al, 1998). The rhythmic release of volatiles from some flowers is often correlated with the corresponding temporal activity of their known pollinators (Loughrin et al, 1990;Schiestl et al, 1997).…”
Section: Temporal and Rhythmic Variations In Methyl Benzoate Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%