Abstract:This paper explores rhythm in social interaction by analysing how partnerdancers and audience members move together during a performance. Theanalysis draws an empirical distinction between choreographed andimprovised movements by tracking the ways participants deal with variationsin the projectability and contingencies of upcoming movements. A detailedspecification of temporal patterns and relationships between rhythms showshow different rhythms are used as interactional resources. Systematicdisruptions to the… Show more
“…The research project "Watching Dance: Kinesthetic Empathy" [31] combined both qualitative audience methods and neurophysiological research to analyze how spectators respond to, and identify with, dance during and after the performance. Albert [1] analyzed how dancers and audience members react to choreographed and improvised movements in social dance by using conversation and video analysis. In their exploration of the tele-presence and performing arts convergence, Cesar et al [7] used galvanic skin response sensors to analyze the engagement of theatre remote audiences, while Radbourne et al [29] conducted focus groups to measure quality in theatrical works and live music concerts with an emphasis on potential reattendance.…”
There is an identified lack of visual feedback in electronic music performances. Live visuals have been used to fill in this gap. However, there is a scarcity of studies that analyze the effectiveness of live visuals in conveying feedback. In this paper, we aim to study the contribution of live visuals to the understanding of electronic music performances, from the perspective of the audience. We present related work in the fields of audience studies in performing arts, electronic music and audiovisuals. For this purpose, we organized two live events, where 10 audiovisual performances took place. We used questionnaires to conduct an audience study in these events. Results point to a better audience understanding in two of the four design patterns we used as analytical framework. In our discussion, we suggest best practices for the design of audiovisual performance systems that can lead to improved audience understanding.
“…The research project "Watching Dance: Kinesthetic Empathy" [31] combined both qualitative audience methods and neurophysiological research to analyze how spectators respond to, and identify with, dance during and after the performance. Albert [1] analyzed how dancers and audience members react to choreographed and improvised movements in social dance by using conversation and video analysis. In their exploration of the tele-presence and performing arts convergence, Cesar et al [7] used galvanic skin response sensors to analyze the engagement of theatre remote audiences, while Radbourne et al [29] conducted focus groups to measure quality in theatrical works and live music concerts with an emphasis on potential reattendance.…”
There is an identified lack of visual feedback in electronic music performances. Live visuals have been used to fill in this gap. However, there is a scarcity of studies that analyze the effectiveness of live visuals in conveying feedback. In this paper, we aim to study the contribution of live visuals to the understanding of electronic music performances, from the perspective of the audience. We present related work in the fields of audience studies in performing arts, electronic music and audiovisuals. For this purpose, we organized two live events, where 10 audiovisual performances took place. We used questionnaires to conduct an audience study in these events. Results point to a better audience understanding in two of the four design patterns we used as analytical framework. In our discussion, we suggest best practices for the design of audiovisual performance systems that can lead to improved audience understanding.
“…However, temporal alignment practices have not been specifically addressed until now. One exception is Albert's (2015) study on the rhythmic coordination of performers and audiences in partner dance, which utilized beats as units of temporal alignment. While this hints at temporal synchronization, the synchronization practices of multimodal gestalts in terms of form, intensity, and speed cannot be described by temporal dimensions alone.…”
Section: Dance In Social Interaction Researchmentioning
Synchrony is a members' interactional solution for dealing with multiple relevant interactional tasks simultaneously when working on two or more separate, perceptual, and equally relevant projects, e. g., when dancing while pointing out a feature of the ongoing dance. This paper focuses on moments in which participants engage in joint meaning-making to identify, negotiate, and implement displayed multimodal gestalts of the choreography. Three temporal procedures of mutual alignment and synchronization were identified through a conversation analytical approach in combination with marker-less motion tracking movement analysis of a dance rehearsal: delays, accelerations, and accentuations. The analyses revealed that synchrony requires constant coordination in order to establish, maintain, and dissolve alignment between participants and their multimodal resources.
“…Regarding dance, the research project "Watching Dance: Kinesthetic Empathy" [17] combined qualitative methods and neurophysiological research to analyze how spectators respond to dance, both during and after the performance. Albert [18] studied how dancers and audience members react to movement in social dance (both improvised and choreographed) by using conversation and video analysis. The understanding of movement qualities by audiences was the focus of a study by Mentis and Johansson, relying on qualitative methods and analysis of recorded material [19].…”
Section: Audience Studies In Digital Performancementioning
INTRODUCTION:We present an audience study investigating the impact of different technologies to create visuals in dance performances.
OBJECTIVES:We investigated four conditions: motion capture, sensors, camera image, and minimal interaction; and four variables: how much did the audience perceive a connection between the body and the visuals; the visuals as merely copying the dancer; how much distracting were the visuals; and how much did the audience enjoy the visuals.
METHODS:We used a questionnaire to collect data. We analyzed it using Friedman's test, and Spearman's correlation test.
RESULTS:The audience perceived a stronger connection in the camera condition, but in the same condition, visuals tend to be merely copying the dancer. We also suggest that the perceived connection has a positive correlation with enjoyment, while distraction has a negative correlation. CONCLUSION: Our results help to highlight the impact that different technology have on live visuals for dance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.