“…Such transformations can also simplify the application of cross-correlation and other analog time-series techniques for quantitatively analyzing the complex interactions occurring within neuronal networks (Beggs and Plenz, 2004;Chiappalone et al, 2007;Grzywacz and Sernagor, 2000;Le Feber et al, 2007;Segev et al, 2002Segev et al, , 2004. Since spike-associated local field potentials themselves largely reflect supra-threshold membrane fluctuations (Bove et al, 1996;Elul, 1972;Grinvald et al, 2003;Kerr et al, 2005;Lopes da Silva, 1991;Purpura, 1959;Whittington et al, 2000), and since such potentials are readily measurable in organotypic explants (see Aptowicz et al, 2004;Baker et al, 1995Baker et al, , 2006Bausch et al, 2006;Plenz, 2003, 2004;Corner et al, 2002Corner et al, , 2005Crain, 1976;Mohajerani and Cherubini, 2005), field potential recordings represent yet another potentially useful approach to the tricky question of burst detection and characterization. Indeed, by virtue of the inclusion of sub-threshold synaptic activities, field potential measurements might even provide a more sensitive indicator of underlying neuronal interactions -albeit at the cost of reduced resolution at the neuronal level -than is obtainable using action potentials only.…”