The Handbook of Speech Production 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118584156.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhythm and Speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speech rhythm is a language-dependent phenomenon that encompasses both the temporal and spectral patterns of recurrence of strong and weak prosodic elements, as indicated by pitch, stress, loudness, and duration (e.g., Cummins, 2015; Fletcher, 2010; Kohler, 2009; Turk & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2013). As a first step in the exploration of the acoustic effects of clear speech produced by L2 speakers, this study examines the effect of speaking clearly on temporal metrics of speech rhythm; specifically, metrics that assess the relative durations of consonantal and vocalic segments (see Section 1.2 for details of the specific metrics).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech rhythm is a language-dependent phenomenon that encompasses both the temporal and spectral patterns of recurrence of strong and weak prosodic elements, as indicated by pitch, stress, loudness, and duration (e.g., Cummins, 2015; Fletcher, 2010; Kohler, 2009; Turk & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2013). As a first step in the exploration of the acoustic effects of clear speech produced by L2 speakers, this study examines the effect of speaking clearly on temporal metrics of speech rhythm; specifically, metrics that assess the relative durations of consonantal and vocalic segments (see Section 1.2 for details of the specific metrics).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is suggested that the vocal expressions associated with these gesture-calls reflected the sonic aspects (rhythmic and timbral) of these environments, the motor-patterns of production, as well as the gestural and social rhythms (e.g., turn taking, social entrainment) that developed within the cultural ecology. In line with this, studies show connections between rhythmic capacities and the development of vocal forms of communication, including language (Cummins and Port, 1996 ; Cummins, 2015 ; Bekius et al, 2016 ; Ravignani et al, 2016b ). As an aside, it is also posited that the process of knapping may have resulted in specific forms of listening (Morley, 2013 , p. 120), and that the resonant and sometimes tonal qualities of stones and flakes may have afforded music-like play with sound (Zubrow et al, 2001 ; Killin, 2016a , b ) 3 .…”
Section: The Biocultural Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This result goes against the hypothesis that isochronous speech, by virtue of a supposedly ideally regular timing of its units, would be easier to track, by alleviating the need for constant phase-resetting. For traditional linguistic accounts too, these results further debunk the isochrony hypothesis, assuming that produced speech would be based on an underlying ideally isochronous form 12 , see review in 13,20 . In fact, our results suggest that the natural timing statistics are actively used by listeners in decoding words, even though they are encountered in a single instance by listeners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We tested temporally modified sentences at the accent and the syllable levels, two hierarchically nested linguistic levels in English and French. These two languages are traditionally described as being representative of two distinct rhythmic classes, based on a hypothetical underlying isochrony of accent versus syllable units respectively in natural speech production 12,13,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation