2018
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201713096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhodium(I)‐Catalyzed Cycloisomerization of Homopropargylallene‐Alkynes through C(sp3)−C(sp) Bond Activation

Abstract: Upon exposure to a catalytic amount of [RhCl(CO) ] in 1,4-dioxane, homopropargylallene-alkynes underwent a novel cycloisomerization accompanied by the migration of the alkyne moiety of the homopropargyl functional group to produce six/five/five tricyclic compounds in good yields. A plausible mechanism was proposed on the basis of an experiment with C-labeled substrate. The resulting tricyclic derivatives were further converted into the corresponding bicyclo[3.3.0] skeletons with vicinal cis dihydroxy groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination in a linear substrate of an allene and two alkynes is an interesting and chemoselective entry to tricyclic tetrahydropentalene derivatives 79 and cyclobuta[ a ]indenes 80 in excellent yields reported by Mukai's group relying on the steric hindrance of R 1 substituents (Scheme 24a). [ 81 ] The Rh(I) catalyzed cyclization of diyne–allene substrates bearing smaller alkyl, hydrogen and phenyl substituents and the following oxidation and hydrolysis delivered the unexpected tricyclic compounds 79 with complete chemo‐ and diastereoselectivity. In this case, due to the easy decomposition of conjugated triene‐containing tricyclic products 78 generated from Rh(I) catalysis, one‐pot, two‐step process…”
Section: Synthesis Of Carbocyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination in a linear substrate of an allene and two alkynes is an interesting and chemoselective entry to tricyclic tetrahydropentalene derivatives 79 and cyclobuta[ a ]indenes 80 in excellent yields reported by Mukai's group relying on the steric hindrance of R 1 substituents (Scheme 24a). [ 81 ] The Rh(I) catalyzed cyclization of diyne–allene substrates bearing smaller alkyl, hydrogen and phenyl substituents and the following oxidation and hydrolysis delivered the unexpected tricyclic compounds 79 with complete chemo‐ and diastereoselectivity. In this case, due to the easy decomposition of conjugated triene‐containing tricyclic products 78 generated from Rh(I) catalysis, one‐pot, two‐step process…”
Section: Synthesis Of Carbocyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thestructure of 10 was unambiguously established by X-ray crystallographic analysis of 11. [10] Interestingly,bulky R 1 substituents in 9,such as tert-butyl and TMS groups (9g and 9h), were found to change the reaction pathway,g iving rise to the six/five/four ring systems 12 g and 12 h in 98 and 66 %yield. However,this was not the case when TMS was introduced as the R 2 substituent in 9 rather than as R 1 (R 1 = nBu, R 2 = TMS).…”
Section: Yasuaki Kawaguchi Kenya Yabushita and Chisato Mukai*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] This one-pot operation was effective to exclusively produce the diol 17 a (77 %o verall yield) in ac ompletely regio-and stereoselective manner ( Table 2, entry 1). [15] When 13 b (in Scheme 4), with an electron-donating isopropyl group attached to the allene moiety,w as submitted to similar conditions,o nly an intractable complex mixture was observed. This result is in good agreement with our prediction that the phenylsulfonyl group must play as ignificant role in the differentiation of the three olefins.D iol 17 a was rather stable and could be handled without any special precaution.…”
Section: Yasuaki Kawaguchi Kenya Yabushita and Chisato Mukai*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both cycloisomerizations include a C–H activation process. Recently, rhodium­(I)-catalyzed cycloisomerizations of 1,6-allenynes involving insertion of tethered unsaturated carbon–carbon bonds were reported by Mukai and co-workers (Scheme c,d). , Despite the different tethered groups (alkene or alkyne) within 1,6-allenynes, the two novel cycloisomerization reactions can both produce 6,5,5-tricyclic compounds. Moreover, diverse polycyclic skeletons (Figure ) could be produced through modifying the substrate or changing the ligand .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cycloisomerization reactions of 1,6-allenynes with a tethered alkene (homoallylallene–alkyne substrate, Scheme c) and alkyne (homopropargylallene–alkyne substrate, Scheme d) show similarities in substrates and products, but they differ greatly in the proposed cycloisomerization mechanisms (Figure ). , Given that the initial oxidative cyclization to a five-membered rhodacyclic intermediate ( I → II , Figure ) in rhodium­(I)-catalyzed cycloisomerizations of 1,6-allenynes has been well established, the key question is how the tethered unsaturated carbon–carbon bond reacts with rhodacyclic intermediate II . , It was proposed that in the reaction of alkene-tethered 1,6-allenyne, the five-membered rhodacycle successively undergoes alkene insertion, β-hydride elimination, alkene reinsertion, and reductive elimination to yield the 6,5,5-tricyclic product prod1 . However, in the reaction of alkyne-tethered 1,6-allenyne, II first undergoes σ-bond metathesis to form a four-membered rhodacycle VI , and then goes through alkyne insertion and reductive elimination to form product prod2 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%