2016
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhodium Hydrogenation Catalysts Supported in Metal Organic Frameworks: Influence of the Framework on Catalytic Activity and Selectivity

Abstract: The cationic rhodium complexes (dppe)­Rh­(COD)­BF4 and (MeCN)2Rh­(COD)­BF4 have been supported in metal–organic frameworks bearing anionic nodes (ZJU-28) and anionic linkers (MIL-101-SO3) via ion exchange. These MOF-supported Rh species serve as recyclable catalysts for the hydrogenation of both the terminal alkene substrate 1-octene and the internal alkene substrate 2,3-dimethylbutene. The nature of the MOF support impacts various aspects of catalysis, including: (i) the rate of 1-octene hydrogenation, (ii) t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An effective strategy for the building of desirable MTMOs or multishelled hollow architectures is using metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) as self‐sacrificial templates or precursors. MOFs, a class of crystalline porous materials prepared by the self‐assembly of metal cations or metal clusters with bridging organic ligands, featured with diversified topological architectures and well‐defined pore structures, have represented great promise for a wide variety of applications in catalysis, gas storage/separation, sensing, and drug delivery . Inspired by their fascinating configurations, MOFs are considered to be versatile templates and precursors for the preparation of novel porous nanostructured materials with high surface area and hierarchical pore distribution, basically via thermolysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective strategy for the building of desirable MTMOs or multishelled hollow architectures is using metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) as self‐sacrificial templates or precursors. MOFs, a class of crystalline porous materials prepared by the self‐assembly of metal cations or metal clusters with bridging organic ligands, featured with diversified topological architectures and well‐defined pore structures, have represented great promise for a wide variety of applications in catalysis, gas storage/separation, sensing, and drug delivery . Inspired by their fascinating configurations, MOFs are considered to be versatile templates and precursors for the preparation of novel porous nanostructured materials with high surface area and hierarchical pore distribution, basically via thermolysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy has been widely applied in frameworks comprising pyridine or derivative units, amine groups, thiocatechol groups, or phosphine ligands, which have high affinity for metal ions. With such a postsynthetic strategy, a variety of metal precursors, such as Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh, Ir, Au, Mn, Ni, Co, Cr, Ga, and Cu, based species, have been introduced into MOFs or COFs to create catalytically active sites. For example, our group reported the construction of a bi‐functional MOF (MOF‐253‐Pt) photocatalyst by immobilizing a platinum complex in 2,2′‐bipyridine‐based MOF (MOF‐253) .…”
Section: Rational Design Of the Diverse Catalytic Sites In Crystallinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tunable pore size facilitates the selection of substrate and/or product molecules in catalytic reactions to achieve high selectivity. Table 5 lists the typical examples of single site catalysts encapsulated in pores of MOFs or COFs for catalytic applications.…”
Section: Rational Design Of the Diverse Catalytic Sites In Crystallinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thec ations within 1-SO 3 H can be partially exchanged with Ag + [18] or [Rh(cod)-(dppe)] + [dppe = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane]. [19] To increase the number of exchangeable Na + cations, 1-SO 3 H was treated with AcONa/AcOH buffer solution (pH 4.7), forming [H y Na 2Ày ][Cr 3 (m 3 -O)(BDC-SO 3 ) 3 ]( 1-SO 3 Na, y = 0.2 AE 0.1, Table S1).…”
Section: In Memory Of Gørard Føreymentioning
confidence: 99%