1997
DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/34.1.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhipicephalus sanguineus and R. turanicus (Acari: Ixodidae): Closely Related Species with Different Biological Characteristics

Abstract: Life cycle parameters of 2 closely related tick species, Rhipicephalus sanguineus Latreille and R. turanicus Pomerantsev, were studied under laboratory conditions. Both Rhipicephalus, which have small adults, demonstrated the same adaptations as large tick species inhabiting deserts and semideserts: high reproductive rate, decrease in egg size, and an increase in interstage growth to compensate for the smaller size at birth. Pronounced quantitative differences between both species were discerned in relation to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In each test involving tick feeding, 10-12 ticks were fed on laboratory animals: nymphal ticks on guinea pigs and female ticks on rabbits (together with an equal number of males). The other details of tick maintenance and feeding have been described in detail in our previous publications (Uspensky, 1974(Uspensky, , 1982Uspensky et al, 1975Uspensky et al, , 1977Ioffe-Uspensky et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each test involving tick feeding, 10-12 ticks were fed on laboratory animals: nymphal ticks on guinea pigs and female ticks on rabbits (together with an equal number of males). The other details of tick maintenance and feeding have been described in detail in our previous publications (Uspensky, 1974(Uspensky, , 1982Uspensky et al, 1975Uspensky et al, , 1977Ioffe-Uspensky et al, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The founders of both colonies were indentified morphologically as Rh. sanguineus according to the published guides (Feldman-Muhsam 1952;Ioffe-Uspenskiy et al 1997;Pegram et al 1987;Walker et al 2000).…”
Section: Ticksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, R. sanguineus was considered as a species complex of about 10 closely related species based on traditional morphological approach 5,6. However, the systematic status of the members of the R. sanguineus group is still unclear, resulting in their misidentification 18,19. To date, phenotypic techniques have considerable limitations for the precise identification and differentiation of all the members belonging to this group 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%