2018
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0575oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhinovirus Species–Specific Antibodies Differentially Reflect Clinical Outcomes in Health and Asthma

Abstract: The variable humoral response to rhinovirus species in both groups, suggests a differential infectivity pattern between rhinovirus species. In healthy pre-schoolers, rhinovirus antibodies accumulate with colds. In asthma, rhinovirus A and rhinovirus C antibodies are much higher and further increase with disease severity and wheeze episodes. Higher antibody levels in asthma may be due to a compromised innate immune response, leading to increased exposure of the adaptive immunity to the virus. Importantly, there… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since RSV subgroups A and B differ mainly regarding the sequences of the G protein ( Figure 1 ) whereas there is little variation among their fusion proteins, it may be possible to develop diagnostic tests based on G, which can discriminate subgroup A and B-specific antibody responses. In fact, our finding that the G-specific IgG responses in the subjects investigated in our study were mainly directed against sequential G-derived peptide epitopes indicates that it may be possible to develop serological tests based on subgroup A and B-derived peptides similar to what has been developed for the differential diagnosis of rhinovirus (RV) infections [ 35 , 39 , 40 ]. Our assumption that the G-specific IgG response is directed against non-conformational but rather sequential peptide epitopes is also supported by the finding that denatured and deglycosylated forms of A2-G showed similar and sometimes better IgG reactivity than native A2-G.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since RSV subgroups A and B differ mainly regarding the sequences of the G protein ( Figure 1 ) whereas there is little variation among their fusion proteins, it may be possible to develop diagnostic tests based on G, which can discriminate subgroup A and B-specific antibody responses. In fact, our finding that the G-specific IgG responses in the subjects investigated in our study were mainly directed against sequential G-derived peptide epitopes indicates that it may be possible to develop serological tests based on subgroup A and B-derived peptides similar to what has been developed for the differential diagnosis of rhinovirus (RV) infections [ 35 , 39 , 40 ]. Our assumption that the G-specific IgG response is directed against non-conformational but rather sequential peptide epitopes is also supported by the finding that denatured and deglycosylated forms of A2-G showed similar and sometimes better IgG reactivity than native A2-G.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serologic assays for RV infection could help to prove acute infections but such tests are not in routine use. Recently, despite high phylogenetic diversity of RV, the development of RV species-specific antibody test has been successful (49). Integrating studies of host response, microbe detection, and airway microbiome is a modern approach in pneumonia diagnostics (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other regularly detected CARVs in SOT and HCT include HRV, HCoV, HAdV, and HBoV, yet information on clinical presentation and impact is limited to selective case series in SOT and retrospective studies in allogeneic HCT recipients. A significant component of the uncertainty regarding these agents derives from the fact that (i) prolonged asymptomatic shedding has been observed (172); (ii) there are numerous serotypes/genotypes of HRVs and other enteroviruses, HCoVs, and HAdVs that are not readily differentiated or quantified by multiplex NAT diagnostics; (iii) the serotype/genotype may confer only limited cross-immunity; and (iv) the respective immune status with respect to antibody titers or cellular immunity has not been consistently assessed (173)(174)(175)(176)(177). Thus, persistent and prolonged shedding versus re-/ superinfection with another subtype is not readily identified.…”
Section: Other Carvs In Sot and Allogeneic Hctmentioning
confidence: 99%