1996
DOI: 10.1089/scd.1.1996.5.391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

rhG-CSF in Healthy Donors: Mobilization of Peripheral Hemopoietic Progenitors and Effect on Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Abstract: Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) 16 micrograms/kg/day was given to 9 healthy donors to recruit hemopoietic progenitors (HP) for allogeneic transplantation or donor leukocyte infusion. rhG-CSF was administered s.c. for 5 days. No side effects were encountered except for moderate bone pain and lumbago. Mobilization was effective, reaching a peak median value of 187 x 10(3) CD34+ cells/ml (range 51.2-1127) and 2170 x 10(3) colony-forming units-granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM)/ml (r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, G-CSF administered to our patients was associated with a large increase on absolute number of leucocytes and neutrophils from peripheral blood (Sica et al, 1996). As previously described, we observed a rise in monocyte counts induced by G-CSF (Hartung et al, 1995;Pollmacher et al, 1996;Sica et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, G-CSF administered to our patients was associated with a large increase on absolute number of leucocytes and neutrophils from peripheral blood (Sica et al, 1996). As previously described, we observed a rise in monocyte counts induced by G-CSF (Hartung et al, 1995;Pollmacher et al, 1996;Sica et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As expected, G-CSF administered to our patients was associated with a large increase on absolute number of leucocytes and neutrophils from peripheral blood (Sica et al, 1996). As previously described, we observed a rise in monocyte counts induced by G-CSF (Hartung et al, 1995;Pollmacher et al, 1996;Sica et al, 1996). Although it has been reported that lymphocyte production in humans and mice is not affected by G-CSF (Bronchud et al, 1987;Pollmacher et al, 1996), we have observed that G-CSF induces a significant increase in peripheral blood lymphocyte counts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20,22,23 There are contradictory reports on changes in the absolute numbers of NK cells and their proportion within total lymphocytes, following rhG-CSF administration. 20,22,23,[29][30][31][32][33] Functional assays produced equally contradictory results, 31,[33][34][35][36][37][38] although in most instances impaired natural cytotoxic activity against NK-sensitive cell lines was evidenced after rhG-CSF treatment. Two studies reported a decreased expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-g, IL-2 and TNF-a 31,39 after rhG-CSF mobilization; interestingly, they observed no change in perforin, Fas and Fasligand expression on allogeneic NK cells, a result consistent with our observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32) In a trial involving the administration of M-CSF to ovarian cancer patients for 5 days from day 14 after chemotherapy, Suzuki et al observed improved NK cell activity during the administration of M-CSF, 33) which agrees with the results of the present study. Although the administration of G-CSF to healthy individuals to recruit hemopoietic progenitors for allogeneic transplantation or donor leukocyte infusion has been reported to increase leukocyte and peripheral blood NK cell counts markedly, 34,35) those studies did not confirm that the effect of G-CSF on the percentage of NK cells was independent of the increase in the leukocyte count. A G-CSF-induced decrease in NK cell activity has also been reported, 2,3) but in our study, no significant decrease in NK cell activity occurred after the use of G-CSF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%