“…Furthermore, rhetorical critics, even those who would boldly claim moral authority by cloaking themselves in academic garb, or by mystifying their arguments in the obtuse jargon of the academy, may be no more ethical in their communication than are used car salespersons, politicians, journalists, or televangilists. Despite this, however, a critic's moral engagement with the discourse studied emphasizes the importance of the critic's character in the discussion of the social method, and in the actual "doing" of criticism (Klumpp & Hollihan, 1989). Because the critic's language in and of itself conveys moral choice, the critic cannot escape responsibility for the morality of his/her response to the discourse.…”