Rhetoric in hostile diplomatic situations: A case study of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's rhetoric during his 2007 US visit

Chaudhri, Vidhi; Fyke, Jeremy P.

doi:10.1057/pb.2008.20

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…; Avraham and Ketter (2008) ; Balakrishnan (2008) ; Barney and Zhang (2008) ; Baum et al (2008) ; Cassel (2008) ; Chaudhri and Fyke (2008) ; Coaffee and Rogers (2008) ; Florek and Insch (2008) …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Unfolding and configuring two decades of research and publications on place marketing and place branding

Gertner

2011

Place Brand Public Dipl

158

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Unfolding and configuring two decades of research and publications on place marketing and place branding

Gertner

2011

Place Brand Public Dipl

158

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, when Ahmadinejad and Chavez were in power, they were often characterized as 'populist' who predicted and took advantage of people's fears, worries and hopes. A study by Chaudhri and Fyke (2008) demonstrates that the visit by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the United States in September 2007 is a result of the efforts that heads of state visits are making under the heading of public diplomacy. The study shows that Ahmadinejad has employed a variety of techniques (representation of responsibility, taxation of the blame, loan gain) and concomitant methods to justify himself, his actions and his policies, in order to broaden and extend his self-presentation system.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Analysis of Dominance and Resistance in the Rhetoric of Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez: A CDA Perspective

2021

UOCHJLL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article intends to compare the speeches of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez with the help of Critical Discourse Analysis. This article has applied Van Dijk’s theoretical framework to dig out the issues of domination, imperialism, violence, resistance, and injustice not only in a social context but also in a political arena inculcated in speeches. The research has analyzed one speech of each president qualitatively to investigate the concepts of resistance against the hegemonic domination of the US. The study finds that both the leaders have utilized positive self-representation and negative other representation with the help of discursive devices. The study has also found the brutality, domination, and injustice of the US. There may be found ideological similarities between the two presidents' positions over the imperialist designs. They are agreed that certain global powers' incursions and hegemonies need to be resisted due to their designs of imperialism and hegemony in places like the Middle East and Venezuela. The Study recommends that resistance rhetoric in politics can be significantly helpful in terms of international political diplomacies and policies for the nations of the world.

show abstract

A (tentative) meta-analysis of the ‘place marketing’ and ‘place branding’ literature

Gertner

2011

J Brand Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rhetoric in hostile diplomatic situations: A case study of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's rhetoric during his 2007 US visit

Cited by 4 publications

References 10 publications

Unfolding and configuring two decades of research and publications on place marketing and place branding

Unfolding and configuring two decades of research and publications on place marketing and place branding

A Comparative Analysis of Dominance and Resistance in the Rhetoric of Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez: A CDA Perspective

A (tentative) meta-analysis of the ‘place marketing’ and ‘place branding’ literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About