Rhetoric, Grammar, Discourse and Homeostasis

Хазагеров, Георгий Георгиевич

doi:10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-2-357-372

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…G.G. Khazagerov wrote about the direct proportionality between the use of fashionable terms kognitivnyi (adjective cognitive) and kreativnyi (adjective creative) and "standard solutions and formulaic statements" camouflaged by these words (Khazagerov, 2010;2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Media as a Reflection of the Buzzword Functional Dynamics

2023

Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the popularity and frequency of the use it is impossible to make clear and unambiguous definitions to linguistic fashion and a buzzword. The criteria of the buzzword have not been established with sufficient arguments, the reasons for the drift of some words into the category of buzzwords, and others to the loss of this status are not fully understood. Based on the material of modern media discourse the article, to a certain extent, fills in these lacunae and attempts to trace the functional dynamics of words that can be attributed to the fashionable language units of the Russian language of the XXI century. Changes related to the fashion category in many areas of communication, in functional styles and speech genres have been noted. Borrowings (mainly anglicisms) and substandard (jargon and vernacular) are among the sources of buzzwords. There are few cases of transformation of rearchaic elements into buzzwords. The functional dynamics of buzzwords is due to both linguistic and extralinguistic factors. The modern language material presented by media is studied in the article using a descriptive method with elements of linguoculturological and linguopragmatic analysis. A sociolinguistic technique revealing the conditionality of linguistic fashion by social parameters was also used.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Media as a Reflection of the Buzzword Functional Dynamics

2023

Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…192 -197], уничижающего множественного [Хазагеров, 2009, с. 260;Khazagerov, 2018], которые коррелируют с множественным гиперболическим. Эту связь (гиперболы и пейоративности) наиболее точно описал А.Б.…”

Section: грамматическая категория числаunclassified

Grammatical Parameters of Conflictogenicity: Morphological Categories of Gender and Number

Brusenskaya

2021

PSFUP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is written at the intersection of two quite different research paradigms – expressive grammar and linguoconflictology. The communicative conflict is produced not only by known conflictogens such as invectives and obscenisms, but also by less vivid and specific means, including grammatical forms different in normativity degree. It is extremely important for the public communication harmonization to develop a methodological construct for measuring verbal conflicts and methods for predictive modeling of the cognitive structures of conflict communication. In this connection, it is important to analyze specific lexicon and grammar units able to become a source of communicative conflict. To outline the range of connotations connection with the possibility of grammatical forms to act as a factor of conflict communication is quite feasible, shown by the example of the morphological categories of gender and number. The terms “conflict-containing”, “conflict-causing”, applied to lexical units, can be extended to separate grammatical forms. Localization of attention on components of non-central zone in the totality of linguistic conflict markers introduces new materials and synthesis to the communicative conflict theory, expands the system of knowledge in the field of linguoconflictology. The same morphological form can be filled with completely different pragmatic content, since grammatical forms can be axiologized, get their own content and functional specifics in the process of expressing the author’s intentions. The conventional values of morphological forms and the permissible limits of their variation are modified according to the conditions of communication and the broad context of the situation.

show abstract

“…In the latter case, we can talk about inter-lingual lacunarity (Dymarsky, 2009). In modern conditions of the developed intercultural communication, the issue of correct understanding of the other nations and cultures' representatives, full-fledged communication and exchange of information and experience is especially acute (Khazagerov, 2018). Therefore, it is natural that scientists are trying to solve the problem of compensating the missing elements of the language system .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%