2017
DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1291650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhetoric and hegemony in consumptive wildlife tourism: polarizing sustainability discourses among angling tourism stakeholders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As promising as this may sound, ecotourism practices are not necessarily a panacea. In fact, the development of ecotourism is likely to experience a broad range of social tensions (Connell, Hall, & Shultis, 2017;Kothari & Arnall, 2017;Øian, Aas, Skår, Andersen, & Stensland, 2017;Pellis, Pas, & Duineveld, 2018). It is surprising however how little attention has been paid in the ecotourism literature to notions of conflict and wider frictions or controversies (Connell et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As promising as this may sound, ecotourism practices are not necessarily a panacea. In fact, the development of ecotourism is likely to experience a broad range of social tensions (Connell, Hall, & Shultis, 2017;Kothari & Arnall, 2017;Øian, Aas, Skår, Andersen, & Stensland, 2017;Pellis, Pas, & Duineveld, 2018). It is surprising however how little attention has been paid in the ecotourism literature to notions of conflict and wider frictions or controversies (Connell et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is surprising however how little attention has been paid in the ecotourism literature to notions of conflict and wider frictions or controversies (Connell et al, 2017). Where conflicts are addressed, they are commonly explained in terms of incompatible goals and motives found in manifestations of human-wildlife conflicts, rivalry over tourism benefit sharing in communities, contradicting depictions of human and non-human spaces, or other land-use practices existing competing with nature-based tourism (Hoefle, 2016;Kothari & Arnall, 2017;Øian et al, 2017). Resulting from a predominantly negative predisposition to conflict processes, a broad range of conflict resolution or mitigation attempts have been explored in places where conservation and ecotourism practices traverse beyond public or private park boundaries since the 1980s/90s (Plummer & Fennell, 2009;van der Duim, Lamers, & van Wijk, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to these risks, recreational fisheries in the developing world have been explored as an alternative livelihood strategy through ecotourism to generate revenue (e.g., Wood et al 2003) and as an economic incentive to protect fish species and habitat by earning potential revenue from non-destructive activities (e.g., catch and release angling tourism in Mongolia, Jensen et al 2009;and in India, Everard and Kataria 2011). However, growth of the recreational fishery sector in these regions can also result in heightened social conflict as larger numbers of individuals compete for access to the resource (Bower et al 2014;Øian et al 2017).…”
Section: The Global Significance Of Recreational Fisheriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overfishing (Post et al 2002, Post 2013, impacts on target species genotype (e.g., through selective mortality, Lewin et al 2006) and behaviour (e.g., , Arlinghaus et al 2017a), ecological degradation (through habitat loss and alterations to structure, Lewin et al 2006), and introduction of invasive species (Johnson et al 2009) have been identified as some of the key impacts occurring in the sector, in addition to conflicts with other fishing sectors over access to fish and space (Arlinghaus 2005). Important social and cultural conflicts may arise during recreational fishery development, as participants from different sectors may target the same species or adopt varying strategies to catch or consume fish (Ditton et al 2002;Bower et al 2014;Øian et al 2017). This can culminate in cultural clashes where, for example, foreign tourists practice catch-and-release, while local values and custom resent this practice of catching fish "for fun" rather than for subsistence and survival .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition recognises that conservation conflicts occur fundamentally between humans. (Redpath et al, 2013, p. 100) In line with this definition, the ecotourism conflict literature focuses on the contradicting ideas that actors have about nature, the inclusion/exclusion of human or non-human beings, the ways in which resources ought to be managed or used, or the harm that tourists may inflict on the social and/or natural environment of destinations (Bosak, 2008;Brockington, 2002;Massé, 2016;Øian et al, 2017). Indeed, "the identification of incompatible goals and motives of various categories of stakeholders has for long been a dominant approach in research on these types of conflicts" (Øian et al, 2017, p. 1547).…”
Section: The Role Of Conflicts In Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%