“…While much is already known qualitatively on the mechanisms of foam displacement in porous media, and many existing macroscopic models [e.g., Kovscek and Radke , ; Kovscek et al ., ; Fergui et al ., ; Kornev et al ., ; Alvarez et al ., ; Kam et al ., ; Dholkawala et al ., ] address the generation and macroscopic displacement of foams in porous media, experimental studies usually involve the use of core flooding units [ Fergui et al ., ; Apaydin and Kovscek , ; Pang , ] from which it is difficult to obtain detailed information on the local foam structure: only global quantities can be measured, and only qualitative information on local displacement dynamics is inferred. In recent years, experiments using X‐ray microtomography [ Apaydin and Kovscek , ; Zitha et al ., ; Nguyen et al ., ; Du et al ., ; Simjoo et al ., ] or γ ray attenuation [ Fergui et al ., ] have enabled limited visualization of foam flow, revealing regions of preferential occupation of the medium by the foam and providing spatially resolved measurement of liquid fractions, also under conditions of oil sweep [ Simjoo et al ., ]. Experiments based on micromodels consisting of pore networks [ Jeong et al ., ; Chen et al ., ; Ma et al ., ; Jeong and Corapcioglu , ], on the other hand, have mainly been used to investigate oil or NAPL sweep, and have not allowed precise bubble‐scale observation of the foam kinematics, or only on a small subpart of the system [ Jeong and Corapcioglu , ], for example, in order to assess the role of capillary snap‐off on foam generation [ Kovscek et al ., ].…”