1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00342457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological investigation of form relaxation and interface relaxation processes in polymer blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
21
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher value of relaxation modulus observed for 90/10 blends to which 1 wt % PP‐ g ‐PMMA has been added, originates from the presence of the relaxation of Marangoni stresses (with a relaxation time τ β ). Similar behavior has already been observed by Rieman et al15,16 and Yee et al13 who worked with PMMA/PS blends. Both studies reported a lower (τ f ) for modified blend together with an increase of storage modulus at low frequencies originated from the relaxation of Marangoni stresses induced by a nonuniform distribution of compatibilizers along the surface of the droplet.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher value of relaxation modulus observed for 90/10 blends to which 1 wt % PP‐ g ‐PMMA has been added, originates from the presence of the relaxation of Marangoni stresses (with a relaxation time τ β ). Similar behavior has already been observed by Rieman et al15,16 and Yee et al13 who worked with PMMA/PS blends. Both studies reported a lower (τ f ) for modified blend together with an increase of storage modulus at low frequencies originated from the relaxation of Marangoni stresses induced by a nonuniform distribution of compatibilizers along the surface of the droplet.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It can be seen from Table V that when the concentration of PP‐ g ‐PMMA copolymer increases, β 20 increases. Similar behavior has been seen by Riemann et al,15 Jacobs et al,30 Van Hemelrijck et al,21 Friederich and Antonov,12 and Yee et al13 Such a behavior was explained by the highest resistance of the compatibilizer layer at the interface to shear deformation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…λ versus λ (relaxation time) and using the location of the maximum in the resulting curve as the relaxation time for the droplets 45. The rheological material functions G ′ and G ′′ were used to calculate relaxation time spectra and to determine characteristic relaxation times 47. The Carreau–Yasuda model used to determine the zero shear viscosity and relaxation time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a microscopic point of view, the presence of these molecular species enlarges the thickness of the interface. Friedrich's team was the first to obtain experimental evidences of viscoelastic features of an interface 42–44. They found a characteristic signature of a thick interface in blends of PS/PMMA with 1 wt % of symmetric diblock copolymer poly(styrene‐ b ‐methyl methacrylate), P(S‐ b ‐MMA), or poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate‐ b ‐methyl methacrylate), P(CHMA‐ b ‐MMA).…”
Section: Results and Discusionmentioning
confidence: 99%