2006
DOI: 10.1021/ie0510932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological Comparison of Chemical and Physical Blowing Agents in a Thermoplastic Polyolefin

Abstract: The influences of popular blowing agents (BAs), both chemical and physical types, in solution with a thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) were investigated with an in-line capillary rheometer nozzle attached to a conventional reciprocating 55-ton injection molding machine. In the experiments, two types of masterbatch chemical BAs (endothermic and exothermic type) were dry mixed with the TPO resin and compared against two types of physical BAs (carbon dioxide and nitrogen) directly injected into a specially designed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the same phenomenon occurred for COC/cCF10 although the magnitude of error in the fiber length measurement made distinguishing such a change difficult. As observed in previous work, 5,11 blowing agents may act as plasticizers in a melt during processing, which reduces the level of Figure 6 Electrical conductivity of solid and foam injection-molded COC/cCF10 composites, with skin and after machining off skin. stresses in the flow field acting on fibers.…”
Section: Hybrid Carbon Fiber/cb-coc Compositementioning
confidence: 71%
“…It is possible that the same phenomenon occurred for COC/cCF10 although the magnitude of error in the fiber length measurement made distinguishing such a change difficult. As observed in previous work, 5,11 blowing agents may act as plasticizers in a melt during processing, which reduces the level of Figure 6 Electrical conductivity of solid and foam injection-molded COC/cCF10 composites, with skin and after machining off skin. stresses in the flow field acting on fibers.…”
Section: Hybrid Carbon Fiber/cb-coc Compositementioning
confidence: 71%
“…Since gas is dissolved in the melt the flow behavior is positively influenced which is reflected by a reduction of the melt viscosity by 50% and more, depending on materials, gas content, and conditions. [5][6][7] At the same time, the engineering effort for process management is increased. Numerous properties of foamed parts can be improved (e.g., thermal 8,9 or acoustic 10 insulation, shrinkage and warpage 11 etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the highest flow rate where the differences are most clearly seen in the figure, the powder CBA demonstrated only a weak concentration effect while the masterbatch CBA yielded a stronger influence on the pressure drop as its concentration was increased. The difference in the pressure drop gradient shown by the glass‐fiber‐filled polypropylene when compared with the pure polymer could not be attributed directly to the foaming additive, since the phenomenon was not previously observed with either a homogeneous LDPE16 or a heterophasic TPO18 using the same masterbatch CBA. Rather, we suggest that the variation observed for the rheological behavior of the composite is attributed to the impact that the CBA had on the mechanism of glass fiber breakage, an influence which was different based on the type of CBA used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Both the gas and carrier resin have been shown to lower the shear viscosity of the melt, which would lower the shear stresses transmitted to the fibers during processing and reduce the extent of fiber breakage 6. The plasticizing effect of dissolved gas in a molten polymer has been repeatedly reported7, 16, 18, 20, 21 (also evident in Fig. 1); however, the fact that fiber breakage occurred to almost the same extent for any concentration of the powder CBA as the nonfoamed sample suggests that the influence of the gas was minor in comparison with the lubricating effect of the carrier resin or possibly there was a synergistic interaction between the gas and carrier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation