IUTAM Symposium on Elastohydrodynamics and Micro-Elastohydrodynamics
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4533-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological Challenges and Opportunities for EHL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Van Leeuwen [42] has used film thickness measurements to inversely calculate the pressure viscosity coefficient, which seems to be the suitable way to determine the α-value when high pressure viscosity measurements are not available. However, Bair et al [43] contested these measurements, showing that the α-value obtained with this process could be much different values depending on the geometry (and consequent scale effect) used for the film thickness measurements.…”
Section: Appendix a Film Thickness Prediction Of Base And Bleed-oilsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More recently, Van Leeuwen [42] has used film thickness measurements to inversely calculate the pressure viscosity coefficient, which seems to be the suitable way to determine the α-value when high pressure viscosity measurements are not available. However, Bair et al [43] contested these measurements, showing that the α-value obtained with this process could be much different values depending on the geometry (and consequent scale effect) used for the film thickness measurements.…”
Section: Appendix a Film Thickness Prediction Of Base And Bleed-oilsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The objective function is the relative difference between the experimental and numerical data. Table 4 shows the pressure-viscosity coefficients given by Gold's equation [32], α Gold This indirect prediction of the pressure-viscosity coefficient using film thickness measurements, although very useful, needs further research and these is not a clear consensus in the literature [33,34].…”
Section: Pressure-viscositymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With specially designed high-pressure rheometers (e.g. in Couette and capillary forms), Bair and coworkers 9,[52][53][54] showed that the generalized viscosity for shear-thinning presents a power-law form above the Newtonian limit. The measurement range of highpressure Couette viscometers is limited by thermal softening.…”
Section: Shear-thinning Rheological Fluid Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%