2010
DOI: 10.1002/macp.201000503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rheological Behavior and Morphologies of Reactively Compatibilized PVDF/TPU Blends

Abstract: Using the comb copolymer PVDF‐g‐AAc as a compatibilizer, five reactively compatibilized PVDF/TPU blends with different compositions were prepared. During melt blending, the carboxylic acid groups of PVDF‐g‐AAc react with the urethane linkages of TPU to generate the graft copolymers PVDF‐g‐AAc‐g‐TPU, which lead to compatibilization of the PVDF/TPU blends. The rheological behavior of the compatibilized PVDF/TPU blends can be described by a generalized Zener model. PVDF/TPU 50/50 and PVDF/TPU 30/70 blends show a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extreme values of characteristic relaxation times α > 0.5 and β 0 (Fig. e and f) indicate that the associated springpot elements of the modified fractional Kelvin‐Voigt model have represented the friction between neighboring chains and the slight short‐term deformations of statistical polymer segment, respectively . The changes in values of fractional exponents with increasing temperature and time of pasting (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The extreme values of characteristic relaxation times α > 0.5 and β 0 (Fig. e and f) indicate that the associated springpot elements of the modified fractional Kelvin‐Voigt model have represented the friction between neighboring chains and the slight short‐term deformations of statistical polymer segment, respectively . The changes in values of fractional exponents with increasing temperature and time of pasting (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Different types of a third component have been added as a compatibilizing agent: a graft [5] and diblock [6] copolymer, random and triblock [7] copolymers, and even a homopolymer [8]. On the other hand, chemical compatibilization entails the occurrence of a reaction in the process of polymer blending, leading to the formation of an in situ compatibilizer [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, desirable blend properties depend highly on the degree of molecular interaction between the components [1], and many polymer pairs tend to form a multiphase mixture because of the thermodynamic incompatibility, resulting in poor interfacial adhesion and unstable phase morphology [2][3][4]. To control the phase separation in incompatible blends, either physical or chemical compatibilization is required [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blending of polymers is considered as one of the most effective techniques to produce technologically promising new class of materials. Polymer blends have attracted great attention to the industrial and scientific communities by its new and improved properties and also for the possibility of recycling . Unfortunately, the majority of commercially available polymers are not miscible to each other because of the unfavorable enthalpy of mixing, which leads to a microphase‐separated structure with poor mechanical properties .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%