2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rh nanoclusters encaged in hollow mesoporous silica nanoreactors with enhanced catalytic performance for phenol selective hydrogenation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metal nanoparticles (MNPs) exhibit a higher excellent catalytic efficiency than bulk materials as a result of a large number of catalytic sites per unit area and higher surface-to-volume ratios. The size, morphology, and interaction with the substrate material are three key factors dominating the catalytic performance of MNPs. However, MNPs, especially those with a critical size of 1–2 nm or smaller, tend to lose their catalytic activity during the reaction because of aggregation into larger clusters. To cope with this problem, various methods have been developed to encapsulate or disperse MNPs in heterogeneous or homogeneous systems by the usage of porous materials such as traditional zeolites, , ionic liquid vesicles, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent–organic frameworks (COFs), porous coordination polymers, organic coordination cages, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal nanoparticles (MNPs) exhibit a higher excellent catalytic efficiency than bulk materials as a result of a large number of catalytic sites per unit area and higher surface-to-volume ratios. The size, morphology, and interaction with the substrate material are three key factors dominating the catalytic performance of MNPs. However, MNPs, especially those with a critical size of 1–2 nm or smaller, tend to lose their catalytic activity during the reaction because of aggregation into larger clusters. To cope with this problem, various methods have been developed to encapsulate or disperse MNPs in heterogeneous or homogeneous systems by the usage of porous materials such as traditional zeolites, , ionic liquid vesicles, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent–organic frameworks (COFs), porous coordination polymers, organic coordination cages, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synthesis procedures were modified from our previously reported work. , For the synthesis of Pt 1 Sn 0.3 @HMSNs, 1440 μL of 0.087 mM positively charged P2MVP 128 - b -PEO 477 aqueous solution, 1200 μL of 5.0 mM L 3 aqueous solution, 720 μL of 5.0 mM K 2 PtCl 4 aqueous solution, 216 μL of 5.0 mM SnCl 4 · 5H 2 O aqueous solution, and 36.42 mL of deionized water were mixed in a 50 mL beaker and stirred with a magnetic stirring at 200 rpm. The desired pH values (4.10–4.20) were achieved by the addition of dilute nitric acid or sodium hydroxide aqueous solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the control silica supported Rh catalysts, the obtained Rh@HMSNs show significantly enhanced catalytic activity, cyclohexanol selectivity and stability for phenol hydrogenation. [13] In addition to metal particles as active species, the other major part of the catalysts usually includes the support. Therefore, the performance of the catalyst is also strongly related to the carrier, whose main role is to improve the physical and chemical properties of the metal particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%