2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2013.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[Rh(cycloolefin)(acac)] complexes as catalysts of polymerization of aryl- and alkylacetylenes: Influence of cycloolefin ligand and reaction conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results clearly indicate that [Rh(nbd)Cl] 2 is more catalytically active than the corresponding [Rh(cod)Cl] 2 catalyst in the polymerisation of DoDHPA. This result is similar to that reported earlier (Trhlíková et al, 2013). On the other hand, DoDHPA was also polymerised by using the chiral Rh(nbd)(L-proline) catalyst without a cocatalyst to afford polymers with M r of 36.2 × 10 4 and 28.5 × 10 4 (Table 1), which is higher than the M r of the polymers obtained by using [Rh(nbd)Cl] 2 / (R)-PEA (Table 1) and [Rh(cod)Cl] 2 /(R)-PEA (Table 1) as the Rh(nbd)(L-proline) is more stable in solvent than the [Rh(cod)Cl] 2 /(R)-PEA and [Rh(nbd)Cl] 2 /(R)-PEA catalytic systems.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results clearly indicate that [Rh(nbd)Cl] 2 is more catalytically active than the corresponding [Rh(cod)Cl] 2 catalyst in the polymerisation of DoDHPA. This result is similar to that reported earlier (Trhlíková et al, 2013). On the other hand, DoDHPA was also polymerised by using the chiral Rh(nbd)(L-proline) catalyst without a cocatalyst to afford polymers with M r of 36.2 × 10 4 and 28.5 × 10 4 (Table 1), which is higher than the M r of the polymers obtained by using [Rh(nbd)Cl] 2 / (R)-PEA (Table 1) and [Rh(cod)Cl] 2 /(R)-PEA (Table 1) as the Rh(nbd)(L-proline) is more stable in solvent than the [Rh(cod)Cl] 2 /(R)-PEA and [Rh(nbd)Cl] 2 /(R)-PEA catalytic systems.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…1,4‐Diethynylbenzene was polymerized in the chain‐growth mode with Rh, Mo, and W catalysts (see Table ) with the aim to prepare crosslinked PDEB according to Scheme . All the applied catalysts are known to be highly active in the polymerization of monofunctional arylacetylenes, PhA in particular, into (mostly soluble) linear high‐molecular‐weight poly(arylacetylene)s . Conditions and results of DEB polymerizations are summarized in Table where also the codes of the polymers prepared are given.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table contains the results of DEB polymerizations with [Rh(nbd)acac] performed in various solvents (CH 2 Cl 2 , benzene, THF, pentane, and methanol). CH 2 Cl 2 , benzene, and THF are known as good solvents for linear poly(phenylacetylene) (PPhA) and were assumed to solvate well also the chain segments of PDEB networks. Pentane and methanol are nonsolvents of PPhA and thus they were assumed to solvate poorly the PDEB segments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The step‐growth homocoupling and cross‐coupling of diethynylarenes provide poly(arylenebutadiynylene)s and poly(aryleneethynylene)s, respectively . The chain‐growth polymerization of mono‐ or disubstituted acetyl­enes results in substituted polyacetylenes and the polycyclotrimerization of mixtures of diethynylarenes and alkylacetylenes provides polyarylene‐type polymers . In the last half a decade, all of the above synthetic paths have been modified for the preparation of conjugated network‐type polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%