2010
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2010.101910.100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RFID Reader Receivers for Physical Layer Collision Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
100
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluate the system efficiency, average coordination time for one tag identification and identification rate (the number of tags identified per second), and compare its performance with existing methods including Maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP) [3], FEIA [10], ILCM [11], and Q-algorithm [9] over extensive Monte Carlo simulations. According to the EPC C1 Gen2 specification, the primary time parameters are listed in Tab.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We evaluate the system efficiency, average coordination time for one tag identification and identification rate (the number of tags identified per second), and compare its performance with existing methods including Maximum a posteriori estimation (MAP) [3], FEIA [10], ILCM [11], and Q-algorithm [9] over extensive Monte Carlo simulations. According to the EPC C1 Gen2 specification, the primary time parameters are listed in Tab.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, along with the increasing number of tags, the position of collision bit cannot be detected efficiently since the wide deviation of received signals [8][9] at a reader in UHF RFID system. Therefore, it is difficult to implement QT-based algorithms or hybrid algorithms which adopt bit tracking technology in UHF RFID systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Mindikoglu et al linearly combine the outputs of the elements of an antenna array, model the source signals as Zero Constant Modulus (ZCM) signals in order to remove the mutual interference and test the corresponding ZCM algorithms on synthetic and measured data sets with a simulation setup. Under the singlereceive-antenna detection scheme category, Zero Forcing (ZF) and Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) are used in [6]. Maximum Likelihood (ML) sequence decoders are considered in [11][12][13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is extremely difficult to be implemented in EPC C1 Gen2 [7] or ISO 18000-6B [8] based UHF RFID systems, because of the wide deviation of received signals at a reader which cannot efficiently detect bits collision positions in a large scale. For example, in EPC C1 Gen2 standard, the symbol rate deviations of modulation signals may up to ±22% between tags [7] [9], which causes arrival times of different tag responses vary greatly in a range of 24 microseconds (µs). Similarly, in ISO 18000-6B standard, the symbol rates of tags also deviate up to ±15%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%