2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2020.3042128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RF Fingerprinting Unmanned Aerial Vehicles With Non-Standard Transmitter Waveforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rogue devices will be classified as one of the legitimate devices which is unacceptable. To this end, the authors in [17], [26], [36], [46] have proposed several rogue device detection schemes. However, some require more than one neural networks to be deployed, and none of them is scalable when a new legitimate device joins the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rogue devices will be classified as one of the legitimate devices which is unacceptable. To this end, the authors in [17], [26], [36], [46] have proposed several rogue device detection schemes. However, some require more than one neural networks to be deployed, and none of them is scalable when a new legitimate device joins the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An algorithm for classifying identical UAVs (i.e., same make and model) in hovering flight mode was proposed in [17]. Although an overall accuracy of 91% was achieved, the authors did not consider interference mitigation strategy for other ISM devices operating at 2.4 GHz.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of the UAV signals are control signals. The more recent dataset is the hovering UAVs RF fingerprinting dataset [17], where seven identical (i.e., same make and model) UAVs were utilized. However, the only flight mode considered is the hovering mode.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the wireless environment is too complex to be modeled accurately, and constraining the choice of the processing blocks to only one of several candidates may lower the performance. On the other hand, Neural Networks (NNs) provide an adaptable and noise-resilient solution for many physical layer processing tasks, such as modulation classification [1] and RF fingerprinting [2], [3], that improve the performance of their traditional counterparts. Similarly, in the domain of receiver design, NNs can offer a closed-form and flexible solution by learning to imitate previous channel estimations, symbol demappings, and decodings, instead of explicitly realizing the mathematical form of these processing blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%