2023
DOI: 10.1002/pros.24508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rezum water vapor therapy for patients with mild, moderate, or severe lower urinary tract symptoms: A retrospective study in a multiethnic population

Abstract: Background: The Rezum System (Rezum) represents a novel, minimally invasive surgical therapy used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Rezum in patients with mild, moderate, or severe LUTS. Methods: A single office, retrospective study was conducted on patients from a multiethnic population treated with Rezum between 2017 and 2019. Patients were categorized into three cohorts based on baseline International Prostat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher proportion of patients in the > 80 cc cohort had a past medical history of urinary retention (25%) compared to the < 30 cc (5.7%, P ¼ .04) and 30 to 80 cc (4.1%, P < .001) cohorts. The < 30 cc cohort had significantly higher baseline IPSS (median 21 [IQR 15 -28]) and QoL (5 [4-6]) compared to the 30 to 80 cc (IPSS 17 [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Regarding IIEF measures, at 48 months there was slight worsening of orgasmic function in the < 30 cc cohort (À50%, P ¼ .04) but an improvement in the 30 to 80 cc cohort (25%, P ¼ .004). At 48 months, erectile function improved in the 30 to 80 cc cohort (15.4%, P ¼ .006) with insignificant changes in the < 30 cc and > 80 cc cohorts.…”
Section: Baseline Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A higher proportion of patients in the > 80 cc cohort had a past medical history of urinary retention (25%) compared to the < 30 cc (5.7%, P ¼ .04) and 30 to 80 cc (4.1%, P < .001) cohorts. The < 30 cc cohort had significantly higher baseline IPSS (median 21 [IQR 15 -28]) and QoL (5 [4-6]) compared to the 30 to 80 cc (IPSS 17 [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Regarding IIEF measures, at 48 months there was slight worsening of orgasmic function in the < 30 cc cohort (À50%, P ¼ .04) but an improvement in the 30 to 80 cc cohort (25%, P ¼ .004). At 48 months, erectile function improved in the 30 to 80 cc cohort (15.4%, P ¼ .006) with insignificant changes in the < 30 cc and > 80 cc cohorts.…”
Section: Baseline Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 While current literature is favorable, long-term real-world data remain limited. [17][18][19][20][21] Additionally, WVTT is indicated only for men with a PV between 30 cc and 80 cc, as studied in its randomized control trial. 12,22 This excludes men with larger PVs (who may bear greater morbidity) and with smaller PVs (who may also benefit from reduction of excess tissue).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%