2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04913.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale – Second Edition: initial validation of the Korean version

Abstract: Our results support the validity and reliability for the Korean version of the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale - Second Edition as a measure of depression and suggest that it can be used to screen students and to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive interventions in school settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it constitutes a useful tool to identify dimensions of psychopathology according to the constructs and domains of function of the RDoC matrix in adolescent depression research. It is used both as a clinical measure to aid diagnostics and to measure treatment effect, as well as in clinical research on adolescent MDD in several countries [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The RADS-2 has demonstrated strong psychometric characteristics and good to excellent concurrent, convergent and discriminative validity in international studies with clinical [22] and non-clinical samples of adolescents [16,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it constitutes a useful tool to identify dimensions of psychopathology according to the constructs and domains of function of the RDoC matrix in adolescent depression research. It is used both as a clinical measure to aid diagnostics and to measure treatment effect, as well as in clinical research on adolescent MDD in several countries [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The RADS-2 has demonstrated strong psychometric characteristics and good to excellent concurrent, convergent and discriminative validity in international studies with clinical [22] and non-clinical samples of adolescents [16,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used both as a clinical measure to aid diagnostics and to measure treatment effect, as well as in clinical research on adolescent MDD in several countries [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The RADS-2 has demonstrated strong psychometric characteristics and good to excellent concurrent, convergent and discriminative validity in international studies with clinical [22] and non-clinical samples of adolescents [16,18]. Confirmatory factor analyses have supported the 4-factor structure of RADS-2 [16,18,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores range from 30 to 120, with a 77 or above considered a positive score for further review, screening, or referral. Three studies were reviewed for this article (Hyun, Nam, Kang, & Reynolds, 2009; Li, DiGiuseppe, & Froh, 2006; Reynolds & Mazza, 1998). All three studies found the instrument to demonstrate high reliability ranging from 0.88 to 0.93.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reynolds [ 12 ] proposed four scales: Anhedonia/ Negative Affect, Somatic Complaints, Negative Self-Evaluation and Dysphoric Mood. The RADS has been extensively employed in a variety of topics, samples and nationalities presenting adequate psychometric properties [ 23 27 ]. The Spanish version, was used for the present study [ 28 – 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%