2012
DOI: 10.1186/cc11282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rewarming: facts and myths from the neurological perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Gradual rewarming by 0.5C°/h was used throughout all periods as it is currently recommended for patients with both intended and unintended hypothermia to avoid complications such as shock, seizures, and arrhythmias. 2729 Thus, we chose a threshold of <20% incidence of admission hypothermia for the primary outcome measure to account for a potentially irreducible number of patients that would not achieve normothermia (if originally hypothermic) due to short transport times. The threshold proved to be a conservative estimate, however, as maintenance of normothermia and achieving normothermia in initially hypothermic patients both improved throughout the study regardless of the length of transport.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 Gradual rewarming by 0.5C°/h was used throughout all periods as it is currently recommended for patients with both intended and unintended hypothermia to avoid complications such as shock, seizures, and arrhythmias. 2729 Thus, we chose a threshold of <20% incidence of admission hypothermia for the primary outcome measure to account for a potentially irreducible number of patients that would not achieve normothermia (if originally hypothermic) due to short transport times. The threshold proved to be a conservative estimate, however, as maintenance of normothermia and achieving normothermia in initially hypothermic patients both improved throughout the study regardless of the length of transport.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rewarming rates have also been informed by observation of hypothermia in adults and pediatric patients and more recently by the research protocols of therapeutic hypothermia in neonates with encephalopathy. 2729 A faster rewarming rate (>0.5°C/h) has been suggested to have no increased risk in poor neonatal outcomes and may actually decrease the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome in the ELBW population. 26 Such a change may ameliorate the increased risk for morbidity and mortality that VLBW/ELBW neonates requiring interfacility transport have compared with their inborn cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%