1994
DOI: 10.1038/372230a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rewards of promiscuity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed, there appears to be a risk of inbreeding in this C. ornatus population; however, there was no indication of inbreeding depression because heterozygosity was not related to any of the fitness variables. In the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis, there are high costs to mating with relatives and females show sperm choice for distantly related males (Olsson et al 1994;Olsson et al 1996b). Unlike C. ornatus, the sand lizards may be experiencing a recent increase in inbreeding risk due to recent changes in population structure and are possibly currently passing through a bottleneck (Gullberg et al 1999).…”
Section: Inbreeding and Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed, there appears to be a risk of inbreeding in this C. ornatus population; however, there was no indication of inbreeding depression because heterozygosity was not related to any of the fitness variables. In the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis, there are high costs to mating with relatives and females show sperm choice for distantly related males (Olsson et al 1994;Olsson et al 1996b). Unlike C. ornatus, the sand lizards may be experiencing a recent increase in inbreeding risk due to recent changes in population structure and are possibly currently passing through a bottleneck (Gullberg et al 1999).…”
Section: Inbreeding and Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in many cases, such as the sheep, wren, chimpanzee and seal examples cited above, the species' natural history renders material benefit explanations tenuous at best. In other instances, correlative methods (Madsen et al 1992;Olsson et al 1994;Kempanaers et al 1999) or manipulative experimental designs (Tregenza & Wedell 1998;Newcomer et al 1999) have effectively eliminated material benefits, thereby isolating genetic benefits as the cause of the enhanced RS of polyandrous females.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, with the exception of one recent study of field crickets (33), the few investigations that provide support for genetic benefit hypotheses have been based strictly on observational evidence. Field investigations of adders (24) and sand lizards (34,35) have demonstrated a correlation between mate number and female fitness. However, as in the field cricket study (33), the populations investigated were likely to have experienced recent genetic bottlenecks and thus inbreeding effects may have exerted an atypically strong effect on female mating tactics and reproductive success (RS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%