Rewarding imperfect motor performance reduces adaptive changes

Abstract

Could a pat on the back affect motor adaptation? Recent studies indeed suggest that rewards can boost motor adaptation. However, the rewards used were typically reward gradients that carried quite detailed information about performance. We investigated whether simple binary rewards affected how participants learned to correct for a visual rotation of performance feedback in a 3D pointing task. To do so, we asked participants to align their unseen hand with virtual target cubes in alternating blocks with and without spatial performance feedback. Forty participants were assigned to one of two groups: a ‘spatial only’ group, in which the feedback consisted of showing the (perturbed) endpoint of the hand, or to a ‘spatial & reward’ group, in which a reward could be received in addition to the spatial feedback. In addition, six participants were tested in a ‘reward only’ group. Binary reward was given when the participants’ hand landed in a virtual ‘hit area’ that was adapted to individual performance to reward about half the trials. The results show a typical pattern of adaptation in both the ‘spatial only’ and the ‘spatial & reward’ groups, whereas the ‘reward only’ group was unable to adapt. The rewards did not affect the overall pattern of adaptation in the ‘spatial & reward’ group. However, on a trial-by-trial basis, the rewards reduced adaptive changes to spatial errors.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4540-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Domain-specific working memory, but not dopamine-related genetic variability, shapes reward-based motor learning

“…In this task, we addressed how well participants can maintain a previously learnt adaptation after transitioning to binary feedback. As participants are unable to compensate for a large abrupt displacement of a hidden reward region (van der Kooij and Overvliet, 2016; Manley et al, 2014), participants first adapted to an abruptly introduced 20° clockwise rotation with full vision of the cursor available. Subsequently, visual feedback of the cursor position was replaced with binary feedback; participants were rewarded if they continued reaching towards the same angle that resulted in the cursor hitting the target during the adaptation phase.…”

The impact of reward and punishment on skill learning depends on task demands

“…The majority of neuroscience research has focused on studying the effects of reward and punishment on decision-making123. However, in recent years interest in using reward and punishment to augment motor skill learning has surged456789 raising the enticing possibility that valenced feedback could be implemented in rehabilitation settings to improve physical therapy outcomes10111213. However, the variation in methodologies, performance metrics, and retention timescales used across different studies make establishing general principles challenging.…”

Basal ganglia contributions during the learning of a visuomotor rotation: Effect of dopamine, deep brain stimulation and reinforcement

“…This is in contrast to what we found since differences in learning were also seen in the post-adaptation phase between PD patients ON-and OFFdopamine/DBS stimulation. In the second arrangement, the reinforcing signal can interact with cerebellum based learning by modulating the sensitivity to errors (Galea et al, 2015;van der Kooij & Overvliet, 2016). Such a mechanism is expected to be nonlinear.…”