Attitudinal change among 323 university tutors of school children was examined in the areas of social responsibility, beliefs in intervention, and perceptions of the disadvantaged. Role theory and the contact hypothesis provided the theoretical base for predicting path models in which tutor traits, aspects of the tutoring situation, tutoring outcomes, and pretutoring attitudes were used to explain attitudes following 7 to 8 months of tutoring experience. Results showed somewhat improved attitudes toward the disadvantaged; however, social responsibility and attitudes toward intervention decreased slightly. Empirical path models for the latter 2 areas were nearly identical, and differed from that for attitudes toward the disadvantaged.