Reward-Processing Behavior in Depressed Participants Relative to Healthy Volunteers

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Dysfunctional reward processing is a leading candidate mechanism for the development of certain depressive symptoms, such as anhedonia. However, to our knowledge, there has not yet been a systematic assessment of whether and to what extent depression is associated with impairments on behavioral reward-processing tasks. OBJECTIVE To determine whether depression is associated with impairments in reward-processing behavior. DATA SOURCES The MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo databases were searched for studies that investigated reward processing using performance on behavioral tasks by individuals with depression and nondepressed control groups, published between January 1, 1946, and August 16, 2019. STUDY SELECTION Studies that contained data regarding performance by depressed and healthy control groups on reward-processing tasks were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Summary statistics comparing performance between depressed and healthy groups on reward-processing tasks were converted to standardized mean difference (SMD) scores, from which summary effect sizes for overall impairment in reward processing and 4 subcomponent categories were calculated. Study quality, heterogeneity, replicability-index, and publication bias were also assessed. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Performance on reward-processing tasks. RESULTS The final data set comprised 48 case-control studies (1387 healthy control individuals and 1767 individuals with major depressive disorder). The mean age was 37.85 years and 58% of the participants were women. These studies used tasks assessing option valuation (n = 9), reward bias (n = 6), reward response vigor (n = 12), reinforcement learning (n = 20), and grip force (n = 1). Across all tasks, depression was associated with small to medium impairments in reward-processing behavior (SMD = 0.345; 95% CI, 0.209-0.480). When examining reward-processing subcomponent categories, impairment was associated with tasks assessing option valuation (SMD = 0.309; 95% CI, 0.147-0.471), reward bias (SMD = 0.644; 95% CI, 0.270-1.017), and reinforcement learning (SMD = 0.352; 95% CI, 0.115-0.588) but not reward response vigor (SMD = 0.083; 95% CI, −0.144 to 0.309). The medication status of the major depressive disorder sample did not explain any of the variance in the overall effect size. There was significant between-study heterogeneity overall and in all subcomponent categories other than option valuation. Significant publication bias was identified overall and in the reinforcement learning category. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Relative to healthy control individuals, individuals with depression exhibit reward-processing impairments, particularly for tests of reward bias, option valuation, and reinforcement learning. Understanding the neural mechanisms driving these associations may assist in designing novel interventions.

Perseverative Cognition in the Positive Valence Systems: An Experimental and Ecological Investigation

“…Moreover, the dispositional tendency to ruminate was found to be positively associated with activation of the ventral striatum regions and increased connectivity within cortico-striatal circuits in response to rewards [ 22 ]. This finding is somewhat contrary to results of a recent meta-analysis of positive valence system functionality in depressive patients, where the largest impairment emerged precisely in the subconstruct of reward learning [ 53 ].…”

Affective Bias Through the Lens of Signal Detection Theory

“…This would be consistent with anhedonia in depression, framed as "loss of interest or pleasure" in diagnostic criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), in which previously enjoyable things lose their value to depressed individuals. This is indeed observed on a wide range of reward-based cognitive tasks (Halahakoon et al, 2020;Pizzagalli et al, 2005). To understand how an individual subjectively experiences reward, scientists can measure the subjective utility function (Fox & Poldrack, 2009;Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), which maps the objective value of a reward, V, to its subjective value, u(V), and is typically expressed as in terms of a power function…”

A qualitative study exploring adolescents’ experience of brief behavioural activation for depression and its impact on the symptom of anhedonia

“…Anhedonia has been shown to be related to dysfunctional behavioural and neural reward processing in adults (Halahakoon et al,2020;Rizvi, Pizzagalli, Sproule, & Kennedy, 2016). Reward processing consists of multiple steps such as the appetitive/motivational, that is, wanting step which is followed by the consummatory/hedonic, that is, liking step.…”