2023
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2525080/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reward Maximization Assessed Using a Sequential Patch Depletion Task in a Large Sample of Heterogeneous Stock Rats

Abstract: Choice behavior requires animals to evaluate both short- and long-term advantages and disadvantages of all potential alternatives. Impulsive choice is traditionally measured in laboratory tasks by utilizing delay discounting (DD), a paradigm that offers a choice between a smaller immediate reward, or a larger more delayed reward. This study tested a large sample of Heterogeneous Stock (HS) male (n = 896) and female (n = 898) rats, part of a larger genetic study, to investigate whether measures of reward maximi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 102 . However, the present study used a sequential patch depletion (i.e., foraging) procedure, which requires the animal to make sequential choices between staying in a “patch” and leaving it for a new patch, rather than typical delay discounting procedures in which the animal has to make mutually exclusive choices between two simultaneously presented discrete alternatives 46 , 47 , 103 . One consequence of the parameters in this task (no inter-trial-interval) is that relatively delayed patch-leaving yielded more water reward during sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 102 . However, the present study used a sequential patch depletion (i.e., foraging) procedure, which requires the animal to make sequential choices between staying in a “patch” and leaving it for a new patch, rather than typical delay discounting procedures in which the animal has to make mutually exclusive choices between two simultaneously presented discrete alternatives 46 , 47 , 103 . One consequence of the parameters in this task (no inter-trial-interval) is that relatively delayed patch-leaving yielded more water reward during sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequential patch depletion is a foraging task procedure described previously 46 , Fig. 6 A, Ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have also reported an increased preference for sooner, smaller rewards over delayed, larger ones by EE rats compared to SH and isolation-reared rats (e.g., (Hellemans et al, 2005). However, the present study used a sequential patch depletion (i.e., foraging) procedure, which requires the animal to make sequential choices between staying in a "patch" and leaving it for a new patch, rather than typical delay discounting procedures in which the animal has to make mutually exclusive choices between two simultaneously presented discrete alternatives (Gancarz et al, 2023;Hayden, 2016;Richards et al, 2013). One consequence of the parameters in this task (no inter-trial-interval) is that relatively delayed patch-leaving yielded more water reward during sessions.…”
Section: Adaptive Foragingmentioning
confidence: 99%