2017
DOI: 10.1002/erv.2505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reward Dependence and Harm Avoidance among Patients with Binge‐Purge Type Eating Disorders

Abstract: Combination of lower TPQ-HA, lower SPSRQ-SP, and greater risk-taking inclination may maintain disordered eating in patients with B/P EDs. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our sample, FA was not associated with the expected factors that are typically correlated with FA. This might be due to the ED sample heterogeneity and to the existence of associations between these factors and certain types of EDs, as found in the literature [77][78][79][80][81][82][83], displaying comorbidity and personality traits shared between FA and ED.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In our sample, FA was not associated with the expected factors that are typically correlated with FA. This might be due to the ED sample heterogeneity and to the existence of associations between these factors and certain types of EDs, as found in the literature [77][78][79][80][81][82][83], displaying comorbidity and personality traits shared between FA and ED.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, it is unclear what drives these patients to abuse such large amounts of stimulant laxatives and whether psychological distress contributes to their feelings of constipation. Cloninger [15] originally proposed a biosocial model of personality which stressed three dimensions of temperament: Harm Avoidance (HA), the tendency to react strongly to anxiety-or disgust-provoking stimuli, thereby over-estimating the risk of getting hurt; Reward Dependence (RD), the tendency to respond strongly to social rewards in order to increase the chance of future rewards and/or prevent punishment, as well as the ability to more easily form emotional attachments; and Novelty Seeking (NS), the propensity to respond emotionally to novel stimuli, acting with increased excitability and impulsivity [15,16]. Harm Avoidance and Reward Dependence tend to be high in those with binge-eating and purging behaviors [16][17][18][19], and high Novelty Seeking has also been found to be a significant risk factor for the development of addictions and use of risky behaviors, as well as binge-eating and purging behaviors [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity to Reward (SR), a dimension characterized by a drive to increase pleasurable experience, and Sensitivity to Punishment (SP), a dimension characterized by a desire to avoid negative consequences, are components of Reward Dependence that are thought to represent stable personality traits [23]. Research regarding Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward in the eating disorder population has resulted in mixed findings in those engaging in binge-purge behaviors [6,16,[24][25][26], although they have not been specifically examined in people abusing laxatives [16,[25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%