2010
DOI: 10.1587/transfun.e93.a.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revocable Group Signature Schemes with Constant Costs for Signing and Verifying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 19. If G-SIG is an anonymous revokable group signature scheme [21] and if for any prover P values idpub(P ) and idprv(P ) are either set to null or the group identity, then TREAD AN O is prover-anonymous and…”
Section: Dbcorrupt(·)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 19. If G-SIG is an anonymous revokable group signature scheme [21] and if for any prover P values idpub(P ) and idprv(P ) are either set to null or the group identity, then TREAD AN O is prover-anonymous and…”
Section: Dbcorrupt(·)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Though signing/verification costs are constant, the size of gpk is O( √ N ) [22] or the size of RL is O(N ) [23]. 4) All costs are asymptotically quite efficient (less than O(log N )), but the real costs are inefficient [24], [19], [25].…”
Section: ) Though the Verification Cost Is O(r) The Signing Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Full dynamic model (Naor et al 2001;Peikert and Rosen 2007;Camenisch and Groth 2004;Nakanishi et al 2009;Libert et al 2012a, b), which allows both the dynamic registration of users and the dynamic revocation of group members, which makes the algorithm has stronger security and higher practicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%