2014
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reviving Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting “SAMMPRIS and beyond”

Abstract: We review the methods and results of Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke (SAMMPRIS) and provide a critical review of its strengths and limitations. In SAMMPRIS, the aggressive medical treatment arm (AMT arm) did substantially better than the Wingspan Stenting plus aggressive medical management arm (WS+ arm). Complications in the first 30 days post intervention led to the disparity between treatment arms. A major contribution of SAMMPRIS was the added value that AMT and li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We thought that the pros and cons of these methods require a clear decision-making based on individual features. Effective exploration for PTAS is on the way forever, and the design of the studies should take imaging techniques, lesion features, stent type, different stages of ischemic stroke, and procedural techniques into consideration [ 26 , 27 ]. There are many different endovascular treatments such as angioplasty plus low radial force self-expanding stent, balloon-expandable drug-eluting stent, high radial force self-expanding stent without angioplasty, and drug-eluting balloon with low or high radial force self-expanding stent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thought that the pros and cons of these methods require a clear decision-making based on individual features. Effective exploration for PTAS is on the way forever, and the design of the studies should take imaging techniques, lesion features, stent type, different stages of ischemic stroke, and procedural techniques into consideration [ 26 , 27 ]. There are many different endovascular treatments such as angioplasty plus low radial force self-expanding stent, balloon-expandable drug-eluting stent, high radial force self-expanding stent without angioplasty, and drug-eluting balloon with low or high radial force self-expanding stent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our prototype testing, we experienced a balloon prolapse to the contralateral site of the connecting orifice so that instant deflation was not possible. Although balloon catheters are well established devices for use in vascular angioplasty or during anaesthesia as pulmonary artery catheters, 31 32 the next step of prototype development will address such complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its first publication in September 2011, the results of the SAMMPRIS study have been the subject of intense debate (9;10). The review by Farooq et al (10) concluded that over time, more effective and safer endovascular procedures may be developed and further trials would be needed to determine if these procedures with advanced technology lower the risk of stroke compared with aggressive medical therapy in high-risk subgroups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%