2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.70.083519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revival of the unified dark energy–dark matter model?

Abstract: We consider the generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG) proposal for unification of dark energy and dark matter and show that it admits an unique decomposition into dark energy and dark matter components once phantom-like dark energy is excluded. Within this framework, we study structure formation and show that difficulties associated to unphysical oscillations or blow-up in the matter power spectrum can be circumvented. Furthermore, we show that the dominance of dark energy is related to the time when energy density … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
226
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
226
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This rises the disturbing question why they appear to be of the same order of magnitude right now. An explicit coupling between DE and DM [5] could provide a phenomenological solution to this so called "cosmic coincidence problem" [6,7,8,9]. On the other hand, there is theoretical motivation [10] to couple quintessence fields [11,12] to DM (see, however [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rises the disturbing question why they appear to be of the same order of magnitude right now. An explicit coupling between DE and DM [5] could provide a phenomenological solution to this so called "cosmic coincidence problem" [6,7,8,9]. On the other hand, there is theoretical motivation [10] to couple quintessence fields [11,12] to DM (see, however [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2), the striking property of the GCG can be found that the energy density behaves as dust like matter at early times; while it behaves like a cosmological constant at late times. Therefore, the GCG model can be regarded as a derivative of the unified dark matter/energy (UDME) scenario (Bento et al 2004). Until now, the GCG model has been constrained using many different types of observational data, such as Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) (Fabris et al 2002;Makler et al 2003a;Colistete et al 2003;Silva & Bertolami 2003;Cunha et al 2004;Bertolami et al 2004;Bento et al 2006;Wu & Yu 2007a), cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy (Bento et al 2003a,b;Bean & Dore 2003;Amendola et al 2003), the angular size of the compact radio sources (Zhu 2004), the X-ray gas mass fraction of clusters (Cunha et al 2004;Makler et al 2003b), the Hubble parameter versus redshift data (Wu & Yu 2007b), largescale structure (Bilić et al 2002;Multamäki et al 2004), gravitational lensing surveys (Dev et al , 2004Chen 2003a,b), age measurements of high-z objects ) and lookback time of galaxy clusters (Li et al 2009); as well as various combinations of data (Wu & Yu 2007c;Davis et al 2007;Li et al 2010;Xu & Lu 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, the unified dark fluid models [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] were investigated as a possible explanation to an accelerated expansion phase of our Universe [13,14]. These models are inspired by the facts that above 96% of the energy content in the Universe is made of unknown dark component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are inspired by the facts that above 96% of the energy content in the Universe is made of unknown dark component. These unified dark fluid models include the popular generalized Chaplygin gas (gCg) model [4][5][6][7][8] as a sample which is a generalization of the Chaplygin gas (Cg) model or a coined model from the ΛCDM model [9]. Actually, the EoS' of these unified dark fluid are specified in different models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%