Revista De Integridad Académica: An Effort to Foster Academic Integrity in Universidad Panamericana

Alemán-Juárez, Armando; Becerra-Mariscal, Arturo Eduardo; García-Higuera, María del Carmen

doi:10.21125/edulearn.2018.1325

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Coordinate and facilitate research integrity officers/champions to promote and create a responsible research culture, including opportunities for an academic integrity framework for policy and practice (including institutional improvements and avoiding the persistence of behaviors detrimental to reproducibility while encouraging responsible research conduct) (19,21,28,43,76,84,98,101,106,110,119,121,127,151,210,235,236,251,255,262,272,277,278,280,285,286,288,294,296,309,311,313,314,318,322,324,(326)(327)(328)(329)(330)(331)345) Support Responsible Research Practices (RRP) as they require facilitation, advice and steer from the Government, funding organisations and academic institutions (progression and progress cannot be done in isolation). Such activity should consider six key areas: research policies; research practices; training researchers; evaluating research(ers); rewarding researchers; funding research(ers)…”

Section: Research Quality and Accountability -Open And Trustworthy Re...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture

Blatch-Jones,

Lakin,

Thomas

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The crisis in research culture is well documented, covering issues such as a tendency for quantity over quality, unhealthy competitive environments, and assessment based on publications, journal prestige and funding. In response, research institutions need to assess their own practices to promote and advocate for change in the current research ecosystem. The purpose of the scoping review was to explore ‘What does the evidence say about the ‘problem’ with ‘poor’ research culture, what are the benefits of ‘good’ research culture, and what does ‘good’ look like?’ Aims: To examine the peer-reviewed and grey literature to explore the interplay between research culture, open research, career paths, recognition and rewards, and equality, diversity, and inclusion, as part of a larger programme of activity for a research institution.Methods: A scoping review was undertaken. Six databases were searched along with grey literature. Eligible literature had relevance to academic research institutions, addressed research culture, and were published between January 2017 to May 2022. Evidence was mapped and themed to specific categories. The search strategy, screening and analysis took place between April-May 2022. Results: 1666 titles and abstracts, and 924 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 253 articles met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. A purposive sampling of relevant websites was drawn from to complement the review, resulting in 102 records included in the review. Key areas for consideration were identified across the four themes of job security, wellbeing and equality of opportunity, teamwork and interdisciplinary, and research quality and accountability. Conclusions: There are opportunities for research institutions to improve their own practice, however institutional solutions cannot act in isolation. Research institutions and research funders need to work together to build a more sustainable and inclusive research culture that is diverse in nature and supports individuals’ well-being, career progression and performance.

show abstract