Revisiting Work-Nonwork Boundary Management: Lessons from the Pandemic for the Future

Raghuram, Sumita; Kreiner, Glen E.; Biron, Michal; Hill, N. Sharon; Hyde, Shelia; Kossek, Ellen Ernst; Piszczek, Matthew M.; Casper, Wendy J.; Foley, Kira; Froidevaux, Ariane; Lautsch, Brenda A.; Levy, Oz; McAlpine, Kristie Lynne; Perrigino, Matthew B.; Turgeman-Lupo, Keren; Villamor, Isabel

doi:10.5465/ambpp.2022.12982symposium

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, there is very little research attention to the potential changes of risks to firms (and employees) under work-from-home arrangements. Raghuram et al (2022) advocate a need to relook at orthodox approaches and theories for understanding boundary management in remote work. In analogous fashion, we see an imperative for researchers to better understand approaches and theories of (mis-)conduct risk in the new world of work from home.…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Work‐from‐home and the risk of securities misconduct

Kanungo

Firth

Gathergood

et al. 2023

Euro Fin Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the wake of the global pandemic, a challenge for CEOs and boards is to set a stakeholder‐acceptable organizational balance between remote and traditional office working. However, the risks of work‐from‐home are not yet fully understood. We describe competing theories that predict the effect on misconduct of a corporate shift to work‐from‐home. Using internal bank data on securities traders we exploit lockdown variation induced by emergency regulation of the Covid‐19 pandemic. Our difference‐in‐differences analysis reveals that working from home lowers the likelihood of securities misconduct; ultimately those working from home exhibit fewer misconduct alerts. The economic significance of these changes is large. Our study makes an important step toward understanding the link between the balance of work locations and the risk that comes with this tradeoff.

show abstract

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Work‐from‐home and the risk of securities misconduct

Kanungo

Firth

Gathergood

et al. 2023

Euro Fin Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Future of work from everywhere: a systematic review

Itam,

Warrier

2023

IJM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTeleworking, working from home and flexible work have gained popularity over the last few years. A shift in policies and practices in the workplace is required owing to the COVID-19 pandemic accelerating current trends in work-from-everywhere (WFE) research. This article presents a systematic literature review of WFE research from 1990 to early 2023 to understand the transformation of the field.Design/methodology/approachThe Web of Science database was used to conduct this review based on rigorous bibliometric and network analysis techniques. The prominence of the research studied using SPAR-4-SLR and a collection of bibliometric techniques on selected journal articles, reviews and early access articles. Performance and keyword co-occurrence analysis form the premise of cluster analysis. The content analysis of recently published papers revealed the driving and restraining forces that help define and operationalize the concept of WFE.FindingsThe major findings indicate that the five established and accelerated trends from cluster analysis are COVID-19 and the pandemic, telework(ing), remote working, work from home and well-being and productivity. Driving and restraining forces identified through content analysis include technological breakthroughs, work–life integration challenges, inequality in the distribution of jobs, gender, shifts in industry and sector preferences, upskilling and reskilling and many more have been published post-COVID in the restraining forces category of WFE.Practical implicationsA key contribution of this pioneering study of “work from everywhere” is the linking of the bibliometric trends of the past three decades to the influencing and restraining factors during the pandemic. This study illustrates how WFE could be perceived differently post-COVID, which is of great concern to practitioners and future researchers.Originality/valueA wide range of publications on WFE and multiple synonyms can create confusion if a systematic and effective system does not classify and associate them. This study uses both bibliometric and scientometric analyses in the context of WFE using systematic literature review (SLR) methods.

show abstract

Revisiting Work-Nonwork Boundary Management: Lessons from the Pandemic for the Future

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Work‐from‐home and the risk of securities misconduct

Work‐from‐home and the risk of securities misconduct

Future of work from everywhere: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About