2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Structural, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of (LaO)MnAs: Effect of Hubbard Correction and Origin of Mott-Insulating Behavior

Abstract: We study the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of the antiferromagnetic-layered oxyarsenide (LaO)­MnAs system from the first-principle calculation. The increasing Hubbard energy (U) in the Mn 3d orbital induces the increasing local-symmetry distortions (LSDs) in MnAs4 and OLa4 tetrahedra. The LSD in MnAs4 tetrahedra is possibly promoted by the second-order Jahn–Teller effect in the Mn 3d orbital. Furthermore, the increasing U also escalates the bandgap (E g) and the magnetic moment of Mn (μMn). T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our recent findings suggest that the G-type antiferromagnetic behavior of pristine (LaO)MnAs originated from the superexchange mechanism of MnAs 4 tetrahedra. 21 This research suggests that the superexchange mechanism dominates in the low doping concentration, while high doping concentration (25%) is dominated by Stoner exchange-dominated ferromagnetic (FM) ordering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our recent findings suggest that the G-type antiferromagnetic behavior of pristine (LaO)MnAs originated from the superexchange mechanism of MnAs 4 tetrahedra. 21 This research suggests that the superexchange mechanism dominates in the low doping concentration, while high doping concentration (25%) is dominated by Stoner exchange-dominated ferromagnetic (FM) ordering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This result shows not much difference from the previous calculation (0.834 eV from Γ to M) with the same U value. 21 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations