2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/lcn.2016.56
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the So-Called Constructive Interference in Concurrent Transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When two packets arrive at a receiver approximately at the same time, whether the setting is going in favor of capture-effect or not, depends on various possible situations. To get a decent idea, we first exhaustively list out all these situations based on the constraints for time-capture and power-capture [28], [29]. Based on the time of arrival of the inter-and intra-group packets at the receiver, seven independent situations are possible as detailed below.…”
Section: Study Based On Controlled Local Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When two packets arrive at a receiver approximately at the same time, whether the setting is going in favor of capture-effect or not, depends on various possible situations. To get a decent idea, we first exhaustively list out all these situations based on the constraints for time-capture and power-capture [28], [29]. Based on the time of arrival of the inter-and intra-group packets at the receiver, seven independent situations are possible as detailed below.…”
Section: Study Based On Controlled Local Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nodes that receive the frame repeat it while synchronising their transmissions down to 0.5 µs. Such synchronisation allows nodes to correctly decode concurrently transmitted frames with high probability due to a variety of modulation-specific mechanisms that are commonly misinterpreted as constructive interference [55,94]. The process repeats until it is assumed to have flooded the entire network.…”
Section: Store-and-forward Packet Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doing the same thing with two radios does not double the amplitude of the transmitted electromagnetic wave, since phenomena outside the control of any single transmitter obscure the resulting signal. Specifically, carrier frequency offsets between transmitters induce beatings in the resulting signal [55], while signal-to-noise ratios vary wildly with the receiving radio's position due to the location dependency of the signals' phase offset [94]. LED-based signals are far less susceptible to these phenomena, because LEDs are incoherent emitters: the coherence time of the waves that make up LED light, i.e.…”
Section: Optical Wireless Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Understanding under what circumstances a node can successfully receive a packet in the presence of collisions motivated a wealth of research [73,128]. Current knowledge indicates that three effects play an important role, often in combination, depending on the receiver implementation and on the properties of the incoming signals: capture effect [69], message-in-message effect [81], and constructive interference [36].…”
Section: Receiving In the Presence Of Packet Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%