1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00622.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Rural‐Urban Contrast: Personal Networks in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Settings1

Abstract: To revisit the rural‐urban contrast, we use data from non‐metropolitan and metropolitan subsamples of the 1985 General Social Survey to test whether, compared to personal networks in urban settings, personal networks in rural settings contain ties of greater intensity and role multiplexity, are based more on kinship and neighborhood solidarities rather than on friendship, are smaller, are denser, and have greater educational, race‐ethnic, and religious homogeneity, but less age and gender homogeneity. Our resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger networks translate to greater diversity, offer access to a wide variety of capital, resources, and opportunities; and increase access to non-redundant and often times innovative information [BEGGS & AL., 1996A;ROGERS, 1995;SHRUM & BEGGS, 1997]. Contrary to expectation, level of graduate education exhibit a non-robust influence, which readily disappears when email access and use are included in the model, while place of graduate education does not play any significant role in network size determination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger networks translate to greater diversity, offer access to a wide variety of capital, resources, and opportunities; and increase access to non-redundant and often times innovative information [BEGGS & AL., 1996A;ROGERS, 1995;SHRUM & BEGGS, 1997]. Contrary to expectation, level of graduate education exhibit a non-robust influence, which readily disappears when email access and use are included in the model, while place of graduate education does not play any significant role in network size determination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predominant perceptions in the countryside reside on conservative roots, are particularly restrictive toward women and promote gender discrimination (Beggs et al, 1996).…”
Section: The Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to geographical positioning, given that networks in rural settings tend to contain ties of greater intensity and density and be based more on kinship and neighbourhood solidarities rather than other types of logics (Beggs et al 1996), we also expect the integrative function to be higher in rural areas than in urban areas.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Acceptance Of The Investment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%