2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the relationship between environmental and financial performance in Chinese industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
3
84
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, a large number of authors [9,[11][12][13][14] argue that those firms that integrate environmental, social and governance factors into management can create and maintain value for their stakeholders by providing better products and services, attracting and retaining higher quality employees, enhancing the company's reputation, increasing customer loyalty, gaining social legitimacy and improving risk management among others. Likewise, from the resource-based perspective [15,16], those firms with strong extra-financial capabilities (e.g., environmental ones) improve the organizational process to efficiently and competitively use of tangible and intangible assets boosting their capacity for generating economic results.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this regard, a large number of authors [9,[11][12][13][14] argue that those firms that integrate environmental, social and governance factors into management can create and maintain value for their stakeholders by providing better products and services, attracting and retaining higher quality employees, enhancing the company's reputation, increasing customer loyalty, gaining social legitimacy and improving risk management among others. Likewise, from the resource-based perspective [15,16], those firms with strong extra-financial capabilities (e.g., environmental ones) improve the organizational process to efficiently and competitively use of tangible and intangible assets boosting their capacity for generating economic results.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation of the mix findings in the ESG-EP relationship could be that previous research has omitted the interactions between different ESG dimensions and their moderating effects [16,25]. To measure ESG performance, many previous studies have been based on a rating that includes different dimensions.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Eanhart and Lizal [72], Galdeano-Gómez et al [74] and Yamaguchi and van Kooten [75], although they had similar research goals, employed different environmental and/or economic indicators to measure corporate performance. This was also true for the following studies: Menguc et al [79], Molina-Azorin et al [50], Yu et al [81], López-Gamero et al [82], Horvathova [89], Perez-Calderon et al [91], Fujii et al [63], De Burgos-Jimenez et al [96], Qi et al [100], and Sánchez-Medina et al [106]. Moreover, this unjustified difference of performance variables was also present in studies with specific goals, such as papers with a greenhouse gas focus (see Dragomir [94], Wang et al [101], Misani and Pogutz [103], and Trumpp and Guenther 2015 [71]) or papers that focused on a financial crisis period (see Gallego-Alvarez et al [97], Muhammad et al [104], Muhammad et al [105], and Trumpp and Guenther [71]).…”
Section: Trumpp Andmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…8;Tung et al 2014;Sahu & Narayanan, 2011). To measure the financial performance of the sample firms, the present study considered the accounting based measures such as Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), and Return on Sales (ROS) (Qi, et al, 2014;Iwata & Okada, 2011;Elsayed & Paton, 2005;Hart & Ahuja, 1996).…”
Section: Estimation Techniques and Econometric Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%