2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00038-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the predictive validity of emotional intelligence: self-report versus ability-based measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
147
0
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
11
147
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In a fatherly attempt to explore the importance of other factors in student achievement, study related to emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement appears [28,29,30,31,32]. The above data are similar to that described studies that the role of emotional intelligence is very influential on the achievement of students' academic achievement.…”
Section: Advances In Social Science Education and Humanities Researcsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In a fatherly attempt to explore the importance of other factors in student achievement, study related to emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement appears [28,29,30,31,32]. The above data are similar to that described studies that the role of emotional intelligence is very influential on the achievement of students' academic achievement.…”
Section: Advances In Social Science Education and Humanities Researcsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For instance, [17] [10], and [18] applied the "mental abilities" model of EI [19]- [21] through corresponding problem-based measure of the construct. On the other hand, some researchers utilized broader "mixed" or "trait" models of EI through different self-report measure.…”
Section: Emotional Intelligence and Academic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete evaluation of the strengths and weakness of each model is provided elsewhere (Corcoran & Tormey, in press), however it should be noted that the Mayer and Salovey model of EI has a number of distinct strengths that make it suitable for work in this area. First, the more specific and limited focus of Salovey and Mayer on cognitive skills of processing emotional information means that their concept of EI measures something different than what is already measured through broad personalitytype variables (Mayer, Roberts, & Barsade, 2008;O'Connor & Little, 2003). Second, the MSCEIT tests a set of skills directly rather than relying on self-report or 360 oevaluation mechanisms, something which adds significantly to the sense that it is a valid measure (Dunning, Heath, & Suls, 2004).…”
Section: The Emotional Intelligence Framework and Teachers' Workmentioning
confidence: 99%