2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23196-4_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the Plasticity of Human Spatial Cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite terminology disagreement, researchers largely agree that these three systems capture the range of available reference frames needed to generate and/or interpret spatial descriptions. Which frame predominates varies on the basis of numerous factors, including language or culture (e.g., Abarbanell, Montana, & Li, 2011;Emmorey, Tversky, & Taylor, 2000;Haun, Rapold, Janzen, & Levinson, 2011;Levinson, Kita, Haun, & Rasch, 2002;Li, Abarbanell, Gleitman, & Papafragou, 2011;Li & Gleitman, 2002). Although relevant to spatial language processing, issues of language and culture are beyond the scope of the current chapter.…”
Section: Reference Frames and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Despite terminology disagreement, researchers largely agree that these three systems capture the range of available reference frames needed to generate and/or interpret spatial descriptions. Which frame predominates varies on the basis of numerous factors, including language or culture (e.g., Abarbanell, Montana, & Li, 2011;Emmorey, Tversky, & Taylor, 2000;Haun, Rapold, Janzen, & Levinson, 2011;Levinson, Kita, Haun, & Rasch, 2002;Li, Abarbanell, Gleitman, & Papafragou, 2011;Li & Gleitman, 2002). Although relevant to spatial language processing, issues of language and culture are beyond the scope of the current chapter.…”
Section: Reference Frames and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 94%