2022
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2022.2078961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the notion of critical thinking in higher education: theorizing the thinking-feeling entanglement using affect theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, in practicing reflexivity scholars must be cautious not to overgeneralize from their own experience. Instead, educators should practice critical reflexivity as an inter-relational praxis drawing on critical thinking, affect/emotions, and their reflexive interactions with others (Zembylas, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, in practicing reflexivity scholars must be cautious not to overgeneralize from their own experience. Instead, educators should practice critical reflexivity as an inter-relational praxis drawing on critical thinking, affect/emotions, and their reflexive interactions with others (Zembylas, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the performativity of speech‐act is based on the notion that language serves not only as a tool for conveying information but also as a means of enacting emotional actions (Anwaruddin, 2015). While Anwaruddin's work (2015) focuses specifically on speech acts, Zembylas (2022) extends the discussions to sociopolitical actions in general, such as student activism in movements such as Black Lives Matter in the US. Foregrounding the affective dimension of social action, Zembylas (2022) stresses that affect is a potent force that operates not solely through cognition, logical argumentation, or material incentives but also at a deep and subconscious level within the body.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Anwaruddin's work (2015) focuses specifically on speech acts, Zembylas (2022) extends the discussions to sociopolitical actions in general, such as student activism in movements such as Black Lives Matter in the US. Foregrounding the affective dimension of social action, Zembylas (2022) stresses that affect is a potent force that operates not solely through cognition, logical argumentation, or material incentives but also at a deep and subconscious level within the body. The cultivation of criticality requires “both reflection and action, both interpretation and change” (Zembylas, 2022, p. 12).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations