2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.105.043529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the no-boundary proposal with a scalar field

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas in the inflationary paradigm, one utilizes the framework of quantum field theory on classical curved backgrounds, in the framework of quantum cosmology, one attempts to deal with a quantum background as well. In this respect, several proposals for the wave function of a de Sitter toy universe were proposed, such as the Hartle-Hawking's or the Vilenkin's proposal, etc., and subsequent works also extended the scenario to include more realistic potentials that drive the inflation [35,36]. However, these proposed semiclassical wave functions do not take into consideration the restriction imposed on the duration of inflation by Swampland conjectures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas in the inflationary paradigm, one utilizes the framework of quantum field theory on classical curved backgrounds, in the framework of quantum cosmology, one attempts to deal with a quantum background as well. In this respect, several proposals for the wave function of a de Sitter toy universe were proposed, such as the Hartle-Hawking's or the Vilenkin's proposal, etc., and subsequent works also extended the scenario to include more realistic potentials that drive the inflation [35,36]. However, these proposed semiclassical wave functions do not take into consideration the restriction imposed on the duration of inflation by Swampland conjectures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it will be of interest to see what happens in scalar field models where the full minisuperspace version can be solved analytically, and where the scalar field is not restricted to small changes only (this is work in progress [28]). Furthermore, for steep negative potentials complex no-boundary instantons with late-time ekpyrotic evolution also exist [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be of interest to extend the current analysis to a scalar field model that can be solved exactly in minisuperspace, and where we are not limited to small excursions of the scalar field. Such a model will be presented in upcoming work [28].…”
Section: Scalar Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another argument for why one should only consider real matter fields is that for p-forms with p ≥ 1 (i.e., not scalar fields) the field configurations also include some integer variables often called the monopole numbers, the instanton numbers, or the fluxes, and integers cannot be analytically continued, though, as noted in [8], this would only lead to a weaker global, and not a local, restriction. Finally, we point out that the addition of a complex scalar field in the no-boundary proposal introduces strong non-localities since in that case the South Pole values of the scalar field are found to depend on the final size of the universe [18], leading to the highly non-local picture of a universe constantly 'recalculating itself' as it expands -this effect can be avoided if the scalar field remains real and at an extremum of the potential.…”
Section: The Lsksw Allowability Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%