2003
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the mouse mitochondrial DNA sequence

Abstract: The existence of reliable mtDNA reference sequences for each species is of great relevance in a variety of fields, from phylogenetic and population genetics studies to pathogenetic determination of mtDNA variants in humans or in animal models of mtDNA-linked diseases. We present compelling evidence for the existence of sequencing errors on the current mouse mtDNA reference sequence. This includes the deletion of a full codon in two genes, the substitution of one amino acid on five occasions and also the involv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

11
113
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
11
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the fact that, in the phylogenetic tree, common inbred strains appear clustered with the M. m. domesticus-derived strain, and far from representatives of other subspecies, shows that the common mitochon- Taking together our results and the history of inbred mice, it is likely that the same stocks of M. m. domesticus fancy mice were at the origin of all three groups; the maintenance of separate colonies in different regions would have resulted in the few differences that are now observed. The most divergent inbred strains were NZB and MilP as already reported by Bayona-Bafaluy et al (2003). Different reasons may explain the divergence of these two strains: the MilP strain is not a true common inbred strain, as it descends from a wild female mouse caught in Italy (Loveland et al 1990in Bayona-Bafaluy et al 2003, and NZB, although belonging to group B (Castle's mice), did not originate from Abbie Lathrop's stocks, but from unidentified "European & U.S. stocks," and it was outbred during its development (Beck et al 2000).…”
Section: A Single Female Origin For Lab Mice Strainssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the fact that, in the phylogenetic tree, common inbred strains appear clustered with the M. m. domesticus-derived strain, and far from representatives of other subspecies, shows that the common mitochon- Taking together our results and the history of inbred mice, it is likely that the same stocks of M. m. domesticus fancy mice were at the origin of all three groups; the maintenance of separate colonies in different regions would have resulted in the few differences that are now observed. The most divergent inbred strains were NZB and MilP as already reported by Bayona-Bafaluy et al (2003). Different reasons may explain the divergence of these two strains: the MilP strain is not a true common inbred strain, as it descends from a wild female mouse caught in Italy (Loveland et al 1990in Bayona-Bafaluy et al 2003, and NZB, although belonging to group B (Castle's mice), did not originate from Abbie Lathrop's stocks, but from unidentified "European & U.S. stocks," and it was outbred during its development (Beck et al 2000).…”
Section: A Single Female Origin For Lab Mice Strainssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The most divergent inbred strains were NZB and MilP as already reported by Bayona-Bafaluy et al (2003). Different reasons may explain the divergence of these two strains: the MilP strain is not a true common inbred strain, as it descends from a wild female mouse caught in Italy (Loveland et al 1990in Bayona-Bafaluy et al 2003, and NZB, although belonging to group B (Castle's mice), did not originate from Abbie Lathrop's stocks, but from unidentified "European & U.S. stocks," and it was outbred during its development (Beck et al 2000).…”
Section: A Single Female Origin For Lab Mice Strainssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations