2013
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting the modifiers: how should the evaluation and management of acute concussions differ in specific groups?

Abstract: Background One of the key difficulties while managing concussion in sport is that there are few prognostic factors to reliably predict clinical outcome. The aims of the current paper are to review the evidence for concussion modifiers and to consider how the evaluation and management of concussion may differ in specific groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
84
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
84
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Additional factors that have been suggested to act as modifiers or potential predictors of prolonged recovery in broader populations of patients with concussion include the following: younger age; female sex; LOC; amnesia; and medical history of previous concussions, headaches, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and learning disorders. 27,30 Although these studies have identified several important clinical predictors of PCS among pediatric patients, limited attention has been paid to features of the physical examination that are associated with specific concussion symptoms and which together may provide important insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms mediating persistent symptoms. 13 The present study meets an urgent unmet need by introducing a novel clinical definition that uses a combination of subjective and objective clinical findings that can potentially identify patients at an elevated risk of developing PCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Additional factors that have been suggested to act as modifiers or potential predictors of prolonged recovery in broader populations of patients with concussion include the following: younger age; female sex; LOC; amnesia; and medical history of previous concussions, headaches, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and learning disorders. 27,30 Although these studies have identified several important clinical predictors of PCS among pediatric patients, limited attention has been paid to features of the physical examination that are associated with specific concussion symptoms and which together may provide important insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms mediating persistent symptoms. 13 The present study meets an urgent unmet need by introducing a novel clinical definition that uses a combination of subjective and objective clinical findings that can potentially identify patients at an elevated risk of developing PCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,17,34,40 Risk factors for prolonged recovery may include female sex, LOC, and a history of concussions, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, migraine headaches, and learning disorders. 25,28,39 Physicians caring for pediatric patients with SRC must take into account all of these factors as well as the trajectory of concussion symptoms and physical examination findings when making the decision to order neuroimaging. These decisions are also impacted by the clinical experience and training of the treating physician as well as his or her familiarity with neurological conditions that can potentially mimic or can also co-occur in the setting of SRC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardized sideline tests are a useful framework for examination, however the sensitivity, specificity, validity and reliability of these tests among different age and cultural groups and settings have not been clarified yet (Makdissi, Cantu et al, 2013 After the sideline assessment, the (team) physician should examine the player in further detail apart from the field in a calm surrounding (emergency room or in the physicians office). This includes documentation of the specific medical history of the player (figure 1, 2.2) (Colvin et al, 2009;Makdissi, Davis et al, 2013) and completion of the neurological examination (2.3), described in detail by Casson et al (2009a and b).…”
Section: Sideline-evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%